Background: The prognosis of patients with spinal metastasis is not very promising and hard to predict. It is for this reason that scoring systems, such as the modified Tokuhashi and Tomita scores, have been created. We sought to determine the effectiveness of these scores in predicting patient survival.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients treated for spinal metastasis between March 2003 and March 2012 in our centre. We computed the Tokuhashi and Tomita scores and compared them with documented patient survival. The 2 scores were also compared with one another.
Results: We identified 128 patients with spinal metastasis. The average survival of patients with predicted poor, average and good prognosis was 5, 17 and 25 months, respectively for the modified Tokuhashi score and 3, 16 and 19 months, respectively, for the Tomita score. Poor, average and good prognosis predictions differed significantly from one another for all 3 categories for the Tokuhashi score (all p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the moderate and good prognoses for the Tomita score (p = 0.15). When comparing both scores, we obtained a weighted κ of 0.4489 (standard deviation 0.0568, 95% confidence interval 0.3376-0.5602), demonstrating moderate agreement between scores.
Conclusion: Both scores have merit for use in a clinical setting and can be used as tools to help determine treatment choice. The modified Tokuhashi score had better accuracy in determining actual survival.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035401 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012013 | DOI Listing |
Cancers (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes and survival of patients surgically treated for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), with a specific focus on identifying factors that influence overall survival and readmission-free survival.
Methods: All patients who underwent surgery for spine metastases at our department in the period 2018-2022 were included in the study.
Results: A total of 175 patients (n = 71 females, median age 67.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
November 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
J Neurosurg Spine
January 2025
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul; and.
Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the comparative outcomes of aggressive debulking (AD) and minimal decompression (MD) surgeries for metastatic spinal cord compression based on surgical burden, functional improvement, and symptomatic local recurrence (SLR).
Methods: In this retrospective analysis from 2 tertiary hospitals, the authors assessed patients with metastatic spinal cord compression treated via AD and MD surgeries between 2010 and 2022. The evaluation included patient demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), primary tumor type, modified Tokuhashi scores, surgical burden, and SLR.
World Neurosurg
October 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haeundae Bumin Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Eur Spine J
November 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Purpose: We aim to validate the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) score compared to previous prognostic scoring systems in spinal metastasis.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2022. The survival prediction was compared between the GSTSG, Tomita Score, Revised Tokuhashi Score, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) Nomogram.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!