A comparison of the modified Tokuhashi and Tomita scores in determining prognosis for patients afflicted with spinal metastasis.

Can J Surg

The Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Que.

Published: June 2014

Background: The prognosis of patients with spinal metastasis is not very promising and hard to predict. It is for this reason that scoring systems, such as the modified Tokuhashi and Tomita scores, have been created. We sought to determine the effectiveness of these scores in predicting patient survival.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients treated for spinal metastasis between March 2003 and March 2012 in our centre. We computed the Tokuhashi and Tomita scores and compared them with documented patient survival. The 2 scores were also compared with one another.

Results: We identified 128 patients with spinal metastasis. The average survival of patients with predicted poor, average and good prognosis was 5, 17 and 25 months, respectively for the modified Tokuhashi score and 3, 16 and 19 months, respectively, for the Tomita score. Poor, average and good prognosis predictions differed significantly from one another for all 3 categories for the Tokuhashi score (all p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the moderate and good prognoses for the Tomita score (p = 0.15). When comparing both scores, we obtained a weighted κ of 0.4489 (standard deviation 0.0568, 95% confidence interval 0.3376-0.5602), demonstrating moderate agreement between scores.

Conclusion: Both scores have merit for use in a clinical setting and can be used as tools to help determine treatment choice. The modified Tokuhashi score had better accuracy in determining actual survival.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035401PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

modified tokuhashi
16
spinal metastasis
16
tokuhashi tomita
12
tomita scores
12
tokuhashi score
12
prognosis patients
8
patients spinal
8
scores compared
8
poor average
8
average good
8

Similar Publications

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes and survival of patients surgically treated for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), with a specific focus on identifying factors that influence overall survival and readmission-free survival.

Methods: All patients who underwent surgery for spine metastases at our department in the period 2018-2022 were included in the study.

Results: A total of 175 patients (n = 71 females, median age 67.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study is a retrospective observational analysis aimed at assessing the effectiveness of eight scoring systems for predicting long-term survival in patients with spinal metastasis.
  • Involves 456 cases, finding that the SORG nomogram, OSRI, and modified Tokuhashi scores had moderate effectiveness for predicting 1-year and 2-year survival with Harrell’s C-index values around 0.63-0.64.
  • The overall findings indicate that while some scoring systems provide valuable insights, most demonstrate low discriminative power for long-term survival predictions in this patient population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the comparative outcomes of aggressive debulking (AD) and minimal decompression (MD) surgeries for metastatic spinal cord compression based on surgical burden, functional improvement, and symptomatic local recurrence (SLR).

Methods: In this retrospective analysis from 2 tertiary hospitals, the authors assessed patients with metastatic spinal cord compression treated via AD and MD surgeries between 2010 and 2022. The evaluation included patient demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), primary tumor type, modified Tokuhashi scores, surgical burden, and SLR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study evaluated the effectiveness of 8 prognostic scoring systems in predicting poor prognosis for patients with spinal metastasis, focusing on 6-month survival rates and comparing their predictive accuracy.
  • - The SORG nomogram was found to have the best performance among the scoring systems, but all showed low discriminative power for predicting 6-month survival, with the SORG displaying moderate power for 1-month survival predictions.
  • - The analysis identified key factors impacting 6-month survival, like primary cancer type and preoperative health indicators, suggesting that future improvements in treatment and understanding of tumor biology should enhance prognostic models' accuracy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We aim to validate the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) score compared to previous prognostic scoring systems in spinal metastasis.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2022. The survival prediction was compared between the GSTSG, Tomita Score, Revised Tokuhashi Score, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) Nomogram.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!