AI Article Synopsis
- A study analyzed patient data from 7108 elective carotid endarterectomy procedures to identify factors leading to a postoperative length of stay (LOS) exceeding one day, which can result in financial losses for hospitals.
- 17.5% of patients had a LOS >1 day, with significant variability across medical centers; factors linked to prolonged stay include the requirement for intravenous medications, major adverse events, and surgeons with lower case volumes.
- Patient characteristics like age, gender, and recent medical history contributed to LOS, but the main drivers were the need for blood pressure management and occurrence of major complications, accounting for only 17% of the total variability in LOS.
Article Abstract
Background: A postoperative length of stay (LOS) >1 day after elective surgery incurs financial losses for hospitals, given fixed diagnosis-related group-based reimbursement. We sought to identify factors leading to a prolonged LOS (>1 postoperative day) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
Methods: Patients undergoing CEA in 23 centers of the Vascular Study Group of New England between 2003 and 2011 (n = 8860) were analyzed. Only elective, primary CEAs were analyzed, leaving a study cohort of 7108 procedures. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of a postoperative LOS >1 day. A Knaus-Wagner chi-pie analysis was performed to determine the relative contributions of each significant covariate to a postoperative LOS >1 day.
Results: A postoperative LOS >1 day occurred in 17.5% of the sample (n = 1244). The average LOS was 1.4 days (range, 1-91 days; median, 1). There was significant variation in rates of postoperative LOS >1 day across centers (range, 5%-100%; P < .001). Factors independently associated with a postoperative LOS >1 day and their percentage contribution to the prediction model included the need for postoperative intravenous medications for hypertension or hypotension (26%), any major adverse event (MAE) postoperatively (21%), low-volume (<15 CEAs per year) surgeons (28%), increasing age (7%), female gender (4%), positive result on a preoperative stress test (3%), preoperative major stroke ≤30 days (2%), medication-dependent diabetes (1%), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1%), history of congestive heart failure (1%), and CEA performed on Friday (2%).
Conclusions: Certain patient characteristics predispose to a postoperative LOS >1 day after elective CEA. However, patient characteristics play only a modest (17%) role in determining LOS. The need for postoperative blood pressure control and MAEs are the biggest drivers of postoperative LOS >1 day, but system factors, such as low operative volume, contribute substantially to postoperative LOS >1 day, independent of MAEs. These findings can be used to guide quality improvement efforts designed to reduce LOS after elective CEA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.292 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Meal frequency and timing in health and disease.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
November 2014
Regulatory Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037
Although major research efforts have focused on how specific components of foodstuffs affect health, relatively little is known about a more fundamental aspect of diet, the frequency and circadian timing of meals, and potential benefits of intermittent periods with no or very low energy intakes. The most common eating pattern in modern societies, three meals plus snacks every day, is abnormal from an evolutionary perspective. Emerging findings from studies of animal models and human subjects suggest that intermittent energy restriction periods of as little as 16 h can improve health indicators and counteract disease processes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMacromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
Phys Biol
August 2013
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Institute of Theoretical Physics, BSP, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. Laboratoire de Physique de Solides, UMR 8502 Université Paris Sud, F-91405 Orsay cedex, France. National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, London NW7 1AA, UK. Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS-UPR 4301, Université d'Orléans, F-45071 Orléans cedex, France. Department of Chemistry, University of Naples 'Federico II', Italy.
More than 60 years of biochemical and biophysical studies have accustomed us to think of proteins as highly purified entities that act in isolation, more or less freely diffusing until they find their cognate partner to bind to. While in vitro experiments that reproduce these conditions largely remain the only way to investigate the intrinsic properties of molecules, this approach ignores an important factor: in their natural milieu , proteins are surrounded by several other molecules of different chemical nature, and this crowded environment can considerably modify their behaviour. About 40% of the cellular volume on average is occupied by all sorts of molecules.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!