Background: In November 2011, the Food and Drug Administration issued a class I recall of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Management recommendations regarding the recall have remained controversial.
Objective: Data regarding the safety and feasibility of extraction of Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads are limited.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing extraction of Riata/Riata ST leads at 11 centers.
Results: Between July 2003 and April 2013, 577 Riata/Riata ST leads were extracted from 577 patients (Riata 467, [84%]; Riata ST 89, [16%]). Complete procedural success achieved in 99.1%. The cohort was 78% men, with a mean age of 60 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 34% ± 14%. The mean implant duration was 44.7 months (range 0-124.6 months). The majority of leads extracted were for infection (305 [53.0%]) and 220 (35.7%) for lead malfunction. Evaluation for lead integrity was performed in 295 cases. Of these, 34.9% were found to have externalized cables. Implant duration was significantly longer in leads with externalized cables (P < .0001). No difference in lead integrity was noted between Riata and Riata ST leads (11.7% vs. 17.7% failure; P = .23). Among leads in which cable externalization was noted, laser sheaths were used more frequently (P = .01). Major complications included 3 superior vena cava/right ventricular perforations requiring surgical intervention with 1 death 12 days after the procedure and 1 pericardial effusion requiring percutaneous drainage (0.87%).
Conclusion: Extraction of the Riata/Riata ST leads can be challenging, and leads with externalized cables may require specific extraction techniques. Extraction of the Riata/Riata ST leads can be performed safely by experienced operators at high-volume centers with a complication rate comparable to published data.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.014 | DOI Listing |
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
November 2021
Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Background: The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis® and Abbott Riata®/Riata ST® leads are at risk of failure and are subject to FDA recall. Comparative risks of various lead management strategies during elective generator change in a multi-center population are unknown. We aim to describe patients with functional, recalled ICD leads undergoing elective generator replacement and report outcomes according to lead management strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKardiol Pol
December 2016
I Klinika Kardiologii, Katedra Kardiologii, Wydział Lekarski II, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego, Poznań.
In December 2010 St. Jude Medical informed about higher incidence of silicone insulation abrasion in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads Riata/Riata ST. The manifestation of this phenomenon is the externalisation of conductors outside the body of the lead, which is visible in a fluoroscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeart Rhythm
September 2014
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Background: In November 2011, the Food and Drug Administration issued a class I recall of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Management recommendations regarding the recall have remained controversial.
Objective: Data regarding the safety and feasibility of extraction of Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads are limited.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!