Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Polymer-free drug-eluting stents (DES) may overcome the shortcomings of polymer-based DES. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the polymer-free TiO2 film-coated stent with abciximab or alpha lipoic acid in a porcine coronary overstretch restenosis model.
Methods: Pigs were randomized into four groups in which the coronary arteries (24 pigs, 48 coronaries in each group) had TiO2 film-coated stent with abciximab (TCA, n = 12), TiO2 film-coated stent with alpha lipoic acid (TCALA, n = 12), biolimus A9-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer (BES, n = 12), and TiO2 film-coated stent (TCstent, n = 12). Histopathologic analysis was performed at 28 days after stenting.
Results: There was no significant difference in the injury score and internal elastic lamina (IEL) among the four groups. There were significant differences in the lumen area, neointima area, percent area stenosis, fibrin score, and inflammation score among the four groups [2.7 ± 1.0mm(2), 2.6 ± 0.94 mm(2), 48.9 ± 16.25%, 1.0 (range 0.0-3.0), 1.0 (range 0.0-2.0) in TCA stent group vs. 2.7 ± 1.24 mm(2), 2.9 ± 0.83 mm(2), 53.5 ± 17.19%, 1.0 (range 0.0-2.0), 1.0 (range 0.0-2.0) in TCALA stent group vs. 2.7 ± 1.30 mm(2), 2.6 ± 1.06 mm(2), 50.1 ± 23.20%, 2.0 (range 1.0-3.0), 2.0 (range 1.0-3.0) in BES group vs. 1.7 ± 0.63 mm(2), 3.3 ± 0.58 mm(2), 60.2 ± 10.12%, 0.5 (range 0.0-2.0), 1.0 (range 0.0-2.0) in TC stent group, respectively].
Conclusion: TCA and TCALA are more effective to reduce neointimal hyperplasia compared to TC. Moreover, fibrin and inflammation scores are significantly lower in TCA and TCALA than BES in porcine coronary restenosis model.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.02.015 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!