Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: Numerical implication of sulcal and gyral topography for surgical approaches has not been studied.
Methods: Percentage gain of distance using sulci as compared to that of gyri was calculated by measuring distances toward the ventricles in 15 hemispheres.
Results: Superior frontal sulcus was closest proving greater than 50% gain in distance compared to superior frontal gyrus; inferior temporal sulcus provided greater gain in the temporal lobe.
Conclusion: Sulci provide upto 58% distance gain. For trans-gyral approaches, MFG and ITG were found closer to the respective ventricular area.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2014.913771 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!