Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.

J Prosthet Dent

Professor and Chair, Division of Restorative, Prosthetics and Primary Care Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Published: November 2014

Statement Of Problem: Zirconia complete-coverage crowns are being widely used as restorations because of their improved esthetic characteristics. Data about the enamel wear potential of this ceramic after chair side adjustments are sparse.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3-body wear of enamel opposing 3 types of ceramic (dense sintered yttrium-stabilized zirconia; Crystal Zirconia; DLMS) (Z), a lithium disilicate (IPS e-max CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent) (E), and a conventional low-fusing feldspathic porcelain (VitaVMK-Master; Vita Zahnfabrik) (P), treated to impart a rough, smooth, or glazed surface.

Material And Methods: Twenty-four specimens of each of the zirconia and the lithium disilicate ceramic were sectioned from computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing blocks into rectangular plates (15×12×2 mm). Twenty-four specimens of the feldspathic porcelain were formed into disks (12 mm diameter) from powders compressed in a silicone mold. All specimens (n=72) were prepared according to the manufacturers' recommendations. Specimens of each ceramic group were placed into 1 of 3 groups: group R, rough surface finish; group S, smooth surface finish; and group G, glazed surface finish. A total of 9 groups with 8 specimens each were placed in a 3-body wear simulator, with standardized enamel specimens (n=72) acting as the substrate. The wear of the enamel specimens was evaluated after 50,000 cycles. The data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD multiple comparison test (α=.05).

Results: The data showed that the smooth zirconia group (ZS) was associated with the least amount of enamel wear (1.26 ±0.55 mm(2)). The most antagonistic enamel wear was associated with the glazed groups ZG (5.58 ±0.66 mm(2)), EG (3.29 ±1.29 mm(2)), and PG (4.2 ±1.27 mm(2)).

Conclusions: The degree of enamel wear associated with monolithic zirconia was similar to conventional feldspathic porcelain. Smoothly polished ceramic surfaces resulted in less wear of antagonistic enamel than glazing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enamel wear
16
feldspathic porcelain
12
surface finish
12
wear potential
8
yttrium-stabilized zirconia
8
enamel
8
wear
8
3-body wear
8
wear enamel
8
lithium disilicate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!