Comparative efficacy and safety of treatments for localised prostate cancer: an application of network meta-analysis.

BMJ Open

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Cambridge, UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.

Published: May 2014

Context: There is ongoing uncertainty about the optimal management of patients with localised prostate cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of different treatments for patients with localised prostate cancer.

Design: Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis to estimate comparative ORs, and a score (0-100%) that, for a given outcome, reflects average rank order of superiority of each treatment compared against all others, using the Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking curve (SUCRA) statistic.

Data Sources: Electronic searches of MEDLINE without language restriction.

Study Selection: Randomised trials comparing the efficacy and safety of different primary treatments (48 papers from 21 randomised trials included 7350 men).

Data Extraction: 2 reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias.

Results: Comparative efficacy and safety evidence was available for prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy (different types and regimens), observational management and cryotherapy, but not high-intensity focused ultrasound. There was no evidence of superiority for any of the compared treatments in respect of all-cause mortality after 5 years. Cryotherapy was associated with less gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity than radiotherapy (SUCRA: 99% and 77% for gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity, respectively).

Conclusions: The limited available evidence suggests that different treatments may be optimal for different efficacy and safety outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of informed patient choice and shared decision-making about treatment modality and acceptable trade-offs between different outcomes. More trial evidence is required to reduce uncertainty. Network meta-analysis may be useful to optimise the power of evidence synthesis studies once data from new randomised controlled studies in this field are published in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024605PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004285DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

efficacy safety
20
comparative efficacy
12
localised prostate
12
network meta-analysis
12
safety treatments
8
patients localised
8
randomised trials
8
gastrointestinal genitourinary
8
genitourinary toxicity
8
safety
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!