Detrusor overactivity in patients with cauda equina syndrome.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

*Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea; and †Department of Nanobiomedical Science and BK21PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, and ‡Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.

Published: July 2014

Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Objective: To delineate the neurogenic bladder type in patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) and to suggest, in light of the clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological findings, a possible cause of bladder dysfunction.

Summary Of Background Data: Many patients with CES experience bladder dysfunction, although the type of neurogenic bladder is quite variable in the clinical setting. Bladder dysfunction in patients with CES is usually areflexic or acontractile detrusor. However, detrusor overactivity (DOA) also reported the cases that cannot be explained by pure root injuries in the cauda equina region.

Methods: Patients with CES with neurogenic bladder were studied, all of whom (n = 61; mean age ± SD, 48.0 ± 15.9 yr) underwent urodynamic analysis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electrophysiology. According to the urodynamic findings, the neurogenic bladder was classified into 2 types: DOA and detrusor underactivity or acontractility. The highest level of injury (HLI) or level of injury was determined and analyzed on the basis of the clinical-urodynamic and electrophysiological findings, respectively.

Results: Twenty patients with CES (32.8%) showed DOA; in most of them (85.0%, 17/20 patients), the HLI on electrophysiological assessment was L2 or above. Forty-one patients with CES showed detrusor underactivity or acontractility; and most of the patients with CES whose HLI was L3 or below showed detrusor underactivity or acontractility (91.2%, 31/34 patients). None of the HLI or level of injury from the clinical or magnetic resonance imaging findings correlated with neurogenic bladder type. We also found that urodynamic findings including maximal detrusor pressure and bladder capacity was partially correlated with the HLI on electrophysiological assessment (r² = 0.244, P < 0.001 and r² = 0.330; P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: DOA was seen most often in patients with CES whose HLI was L2 or above, and might be associated with combined conus medullaris lesion. Electrophysiology might be the most useful assessment tool for prediction of neurogenic bladder type in patients with CES.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000410DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients ces
32
neurogenic bladder
24
patients
12
cauda equina
12
bladder type
12
detrusor underactivity
12
underactivity acontractility
12
level injury
12
bladder
10
ces
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!