The purpose of this study was to obtain evidence regarding the validity and reliability of an instrument to measure the self-reported competencies of interprofessional care in interprofessional education programs. Five hundred and eighty-four students and clinicians in Canada and New Zealand who were registered in 15 interprofessional education undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing professional development programs completed the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) using a retrospective pre-test/post-test design. Factor analyses showed the presence of two factors in the pre-program items and one factor in the post-program items. Tests conducted provided evidence in support of the validity and reliability of the ICCAS as a self-assessment instrument for interprofessional collaborative practice. Internal consistency was high for items loading on factor 1 (α = 0.96) and factor 2 (α = 0.94) in the pre-program assessment and for the items in the post-program assessment (α = 0.98). The transition from a two factor solution to a single factor structure suggests interventions influence learners' understanding of interprofessional care by promoting the recognition of the high degree of interrelation among interprofessional care competencies. Scores on the ICCAS are reliable and predict meaningful outcomes with regard to attitudes toward interprofessional competency attainment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.917407 | DOI Listing |
Nurs Outlook
January 2025
School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Background: Microaggressions are pervasive in clinical and academic environments, often unnoticed by those unaware of the privileges and power dynamics tied to socially constructed hierarchies. These subtle manifestations of bias and prejudice are typically directed toward historically marginalized individuals and groups (HMIGs), contributing to a toxic culture that undermines interprofessional communication, collaboration, and healthcare delivery.
Purpose: This article aims to explore the concept of microaggressions and their impact on healthcare environments.
J Interprof Care
January 2025
Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA.
Collaboration between occupational therapists and speech-language pathologists is crucial in stroke rehabilitation to effectively manage the complex challenges patients often experience after stroke. This article describes a two-hour, case-based interprofessional education (IPE) stroke workshop that required 67 graduate occupation therapy (OT) and speech-language pathology (SLP) students to collaboratively solve a case study related to stroke. Students used a survey to self-assess their interprofessional collaborative practice before and after participating in the workshop and completed a reflection journal.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Interprof Care
January 2025
University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Australia.
Allied health clinical educators (AHCEs) are vital to health professional student education and clinical education is often expected in a job role. Communities of practice (CoPs) may be a strategy to meet educator learning needs. A rapid review was conducted to determine the structures, purposes, and outcomes of AHCE CoPs, and barriers or enablers of participation in CoPs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNurse Educ Today
January 2025
Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, United States of America; 801 S. Paulina St. Room 204B, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America. Electronic address:
Background: Teaching collaborative practice behaviors (CPBs) to interprofessional healthcare students could improve healthcare for underserved populations.
Objective: This study explained the impact of Simulation Enhanced Interprofessional Education (SIM-IPE) on healthcare students' self-reported CPBs and their perceptions of utilizing CPBs when caring for underserved populations, as well as the differences among professions within interprofessional teams.
Design: Mixed methods explanatory design.
J Particip Med
January 2025
Department of Ambulatory Care, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Background: Health authorities worldwide have invested in digital technologies to establish robust information exchange systems for improving the safety and efficiency of medication management. Nevertheless, inaccurate medication lists and information gaps are common, particularly during care transitions, leading to avoidable harm, inefficiencies, and increased costs. Besides fragmented health care processes, the inconsistent incorporation of patient-driven changes contributes to these problems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!