Reliability Assessment of Arthroscopic Findings Versus MRI in ACL Injuries of the Knee.

Acta Inform Med

Department of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, 50 Divizija bb, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.

Published: April 2014

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Introduction: This study was conducted to analyze the reliability of clinical diagnosis in ACL tear injuries.

Material And Methods: All patients attending our clinic with knee pain from 2009 to 2013 underwent systematic and thorough clinical assessment. From one hundred and three patients with knee problems in 73 were arhroscopicaly diagnosed ACL tears. All these patients underwent therapeutic arthroscopic knee surgery. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed during this procedure. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on these arthroscopic findings.

Results: The accuracy of clinical diagnosis in our study was 82.5% for ACL tears. Our study revealed high sensitivity and specificity and almost high accuracy for ACL injuries of knee joint in comparison to arthroscopy. MRI is an appropriate screening tool for therapeutic arthroscopy, making diagnostic arthroscopy unnecessary in most patients.

Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging is accurate and non invasive modality for the assessment of ligamentous injuries. It can be used as a first line investigation in patients with soft tissue trauma to knee.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008041PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.111-114DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical diagnosis
12
acl injuries
8
injuries knee
8
acl tears
8
sensitivity specificity
8
knee
6
acl
5
reliability assessment
4
assessment arthroscopic
4
arthroscopic findings
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!