A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Topical application of Chinese herbal medicine for atopic eczema: a systematic review with a meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Topical application of Chinese herbal medicine for atopic eczema: a systematic review with a meta-analysis.

Dermatology

Discipline of Chinese Medicine, School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

Published: April 2015

Background: Atopic eczema (AE) affects 10-20% of children in industrialised countries.

Objective: This review systematically evaluated the effects and safety of topical use of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for AE.

Methods: Randomised controlled trials on topical use of CHM were identified through searching electronic databases. Their risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analysis was conducted by employing the RevMan 5.2 software.

Results: Ten studies involving 1,058 participants were included. These studies had high risk of bias in randomisation, blinding and outcome data. Meta-analysis showed that topical applications of CHM were superior to conventional medications in total effectiveness rate (risk ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.36). No significant difference was observed in overall skin lesion score (standardised mean difference -0.05; 95% confidence interval -0.88 to 0.78) compared to corticosteroid creams.

Conclusions: There was no conclusive evidence to demonstrate that topical application of CHM for AE was superior to other control interventions due to methodological weaknesses of the included randomised controlled trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000360526DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

topical application
8
chinese herbal
8
herbal medicine
8
atopic eczema
8
randomised controlled
8
controlled trials
8
risk bias
8
chm superior
8
95% confidence
8
confidence interval
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!