Comparison of Efficacy and Tolerability of Hylan G-F 20 in Patients with and without Effusions at the Time of Initial Injection.

J Knee Surg

Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Specialists of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.

Published: June 2015

An effusion at the onset of viscosupplementation has been thought to diminish the efficacy and increase adverse event rates. This study compares efficacy of hylan G-F 20 in patients with and without an effusion. Patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) received three weekly injections of hylan G-F 20. A total of 50 patients with an effusion requiring aspiration were compared with 50 matched patients without an effusion. Outcome measurements included Western Ontario and McMaster's Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were followed for 26 weeks. Both effusion and control group VAS was significantly lowered at all time points. WOMAC scores improved (p < 0.025) at all visits in the effusion group except for WOMAC A-1 week 14. Control WOMAC scores also significantly improved at all visits (p < 0.027), except for full WOMAC and WOMAC A-1 at week 1. Neither group experienced an adverse event. Presence of an effusion at onset of viscosupplementation requiring aspiration does not negatively impact efficacy of hylan G-F 20 or increase adverse event rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1376328DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hylan g-f
12
patients effusion
12
g-f patients
8
patients
6
effusion
5
comparison efficacy
4
efficacy tolerability
4
tolerability hylan
4
patients effusions
4
effusions time
4

Similar Publications

Background: Viscosupplementation is a viable alternative for managing knee osteoarthritis, showing potential to delay the need for total joint replacement in affected patients.

Methods: We constructed an economic model that compared viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20, with available hyaluronic acids, and no viscosupplementation over a 5-year period, from the perspective of the Colombian general health system. Time until total knee replacement, sourced from published literature, informed the model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Clinical trials on the use of viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are inconsistent, making it challenging to determine its value in clinical practice. One issue is the availability of various HA products on the market; differences in their chemical features can impact patient outcomes. Herein, we assess the efficacy and safety of three once-weekly intra-articular (IA) injections of Hylan G-F 20, a high-molecular-weight and highly crosslinked HA product, in patients with KOA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Hyaluronic acid (HA) use to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been extensively investigated in the literature. There are also multiple economic assessments comparing intra-articular HAs with oral anti-inflammatory medicines and other conservative measures (NSAIDs), as well as different types and formulations of HA. Owing to the broad landscape of evidence across this area, it is important to further understand the empirical data comparing HA products, as well as the health economic implications that exist between commercially available HAs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Symptoms can vary over time, leading to episodes of worsened symptoms known as flares. Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid has demonstrated long-term symptomatic relief in the broader knee osteoarthritis population, although its use in the flare population has not been extensively examined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!