Quartz tuning forks are being increasingly employed as sensors in non-contact atomic force microscopy especially in the "qPlus" design. In this study a new and easily applicable setup has been used to determine the static spring constant at several positions along the prong of the tuning fork. The results show a significant deviation from values calculated with the beam formula. In order to understand this discrepancy the complete sensor set-up has been digitally rebuilt and analyzed by using finite element method simulations. These simulations provide a detailed view of the strain/stress distribution inside the tuning fork. The simulations show quantitative agreement with the beam formula if the beam origin is shifted to the position of zero stress onset inside the tuning fork base and torsional effects are also included. We further found significant discrepancies between experimental calibration values and predictions from the shifted beam formula, which are related to a large variance in tip misalignment during the tuning fork assembling process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999819PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.59DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tuning fork
20
beam formula
12
quartz tuning
8
non-contact atomic
8
atomic force
8
force microscopy
8
inside tuning
8
tuning
6
fork
5
calibration quartz
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!