Timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for trauma.

Surg Neurol Int

Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Published: April 2014

Background: The optimal timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for trauma is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if early cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for trauma reduces complications.

Methods: Consecutive cases of patients who underwent autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for trauma at a single Level I Trauma Center were studied in a retrospective 10 year data review. Associations of categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results: A total of 157 patients were divided into early (<12 weeks; 78 patients) and late (≥12 weeks; 79 patients) cranioplasty cohorts. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts. Cranioplasty operative time was significantly shorter in the early (102 minutes) than the late (125 minutes) cranioplasty cohort (P = 0.0482). Overall complication rate in both cohorts was 35%. Infection rates were lower in the early (7.7%) than the late (14%) cranioplasty cohort as was bone graft resorption (15% early, 19% late), hydrocephalus rate (7.7% early, 1.3% late), and postoperative hematoma incidence (3.9% early, 1.3% late). However, these differences were not statistically significant. Patients <18 years of age were at higher risk of bone graft resorption than patients ≥18 years of age (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.25-8.81; P = 0.0162).

Conclusions: After decompressive craniectomy for trauma, early (<12 weeks) cranioplasty does not alter the incidence of complication rates. In patients <18 years of age, early (<12 weeks) cranioplasty increases the risk of bone resorption. Delaying cranioplasty (≥12 weeks) results in longer operative times and may increase costs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994696PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.127762DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cranioplasty decompressive
16
decompressive craniectomy
16
craniectomy trauma
16
timing cranioplasty
8
trauma
5
decompressive
4
craniectomy
4
trauma background
4
background optimal
4
optimal timing
4

Similar Publications

BACKGROUND Decompressive craniectomy is a common life-saving intervention in the setting of elevated intracranial pressure. Cranioplasty restores the calvarium and intracranial physiology once swelling recedes. Cranioplasty is often thought of as a low-risk intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Decompressive craniectomy is one of the most common procedures for managing severe traumatic brain injury. Cranioplasty plays a vital role in restoring the integrity of the skull and preventing complications that may arise after a decompressive craniectomy. This case report presents a 24-year-old woman who underwent cranioplasty with a cryopreserved autologous bone flap.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BACKGROUND Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery is a widely used procedure for managing hydrocephalus; however, postoperative infections remain a serious complication, increasing morbidity and mortality. Known risk factors include prior surgeries, steroid use, and concurrent procedures. However, the role of liver cirrhosis, a condition that compromises immune function and predisposes patients to infections, has not been fully investigated in the context of neurosurgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Challenges in the Management of a Calvarial Defect in an NF1-Patient.

Diseases

December 2024

The Leo M. Davidoff Department of Neurological Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.

Background: Calvarial defects in NF1 are rare and lack standardized management guidelines. This study seeks to shed light on calvarial defects in NF1 patients with extensive skull erosion.

Methods: This case report focuses on clinical and radiological presentations and surgical interventions during six years of follow-up, comparing the results with those in the literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study examined the viability and impact of 3D-printed external cranial protection devices (ECPD) in preventing complications after unilateral decompressive craniectomy (DC).
  • A cohort of 44 patients was evaluated, with 24 using the ECPD and 20 receiving standard treatment, showing no significant differences in overall outcomes but a notable reduction in specific complications like subdural effusion for the ECPD group.
  • Results suggest that while the ECPD is safe and helps reduce some complications post-DC, it does not significantly enhance patient prognosis, indicating the need for additional research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!