Lynch syndrome (LS), the most frequent form of hereditary colorectal cancer, shows a highly penetrant, autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Distinction of LS colorectal carcinoma instances from the much more common sporadic colorectal carcinoma cases is of paramount importance. Revised Bethesda Guidelines were developed to diagnose LS by evaluating a combination of clinical and pathologic data. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of the pathology items included in the Revised Bethesda Guidelines. We have prospectively studied a series of 1624 consecutive colorectal carcinomas with an algorithm including immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair proteins and molecular study of microsatellite instability and BRAF c.1799 T > A (p.V600E) gene mutations. Patients with tumors showing LS features were referred for germline mutation analysis. By applying our algorithmic approach, we were able to identify LS features in 89 colorectal cancer patients, of whom only 27 met Revised Bethesda Guidelines pathology criteria. Of the 89 patients, 47 were then studied at the Genetic Counseling Unit, and LS was confirmed in 18, of whom 7 had not been identified by the Revised Bethesda Guidelines. Our study shows that the Revised Bethesda Guidelines failed to detect 70% of patients at risk of LS. Our algorithmic approach is a realistic and effective tool for LS identification. We strongly recommend the implementation of universal population screening for LS among all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal carcinoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2014.02.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

revised bethesda
20
bethesda guidelines
20
colorectal carcinoma
12
mismatch repair
8
population screening
8
lynch syndrome
8
colorectal cancer
8
algorithmic approach
8
colorectal
6
revised
5

Similar Publications

Background: A number of efforts have been made to tailor behavioral healthcare treatments to the variable needs of patients with low back pain (LBP). The most common approach involves the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) to triage the need for psychologically informed care, which explores concerns about pain and addresses unhelpful beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Such beliefs that pain always signifies injury or tissue damage and that exercise should be avoided have been implied as psychosocial mediators of chronic pain and can impede recovery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Persisting post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) is a condition characterized by prolonged recovery from a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and compromised quality of life. Previous literature, on the basis of small sample sizes, concludes that there are several risk factors for the development of PPCS.

Objective: We seek to identify protective and risk factors for developing slow recovery or persisting post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) by analyzing medical history, contact sport level, setting, and the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) assessments at baseline and post-injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Identification of genetic alleles associated with both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and concussion severity/recovery could help explain the association between concussion and elevated dementia risk. However, there has been little investigation into whether AD risk genes associate with concussion severity/recovery, and the limited findings are mixed.

Objective: We used AD polygenic risk scores (PRS) and APOE genotypes to investigate any such associations in the NCAA-DoD Grand Alliance CARE Consortium (CARE) dataset.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To identify the rate of fixation failure following femoral neck fracture (FNF) fixation in young adults within a national database.

Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: National all-payer claims database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Research supports cognitive behavioral therapies for nightmares (CBT-N) in adults. However, the nuances of implementation and unstandardized nomenclature for treatment components has created confusion in the field. To provide clarification, an expert consensus panel convened to review treatment manual components and to develop guidelines for the standardized implementation and terminology of CBT-N.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!