Effect of phaco tip diameter on efficiency and chatter.

J Cataract Refract Surg

From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Electronic address:

Published: May 2014

Purpose: To evaluate 3 phacoemulsification tips of different sizes and determine which size is most efficient in lens fragment removal using 3 ultrasound (US) approaches.

Setting: John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Design: Experimental study.

Methods: Porcine lens nuclei were formalin-soaked for 2 hours then divided into 2.0 mm cubes; 1.1 mm, 0.9 mm, and 0.7 mm phaco tips were used with torsional and micropulsed US. The 1.1 mm tips were unavailable for torsional US, so 0.9 mm and 0.7 mm tips were used. Efficiency (amount of time for lens removal) and chatter (number of lens-fragment repulsions from the tip) were determined.

Results: The mean phacoemulsification efficiency was highest with the 0.9 mm tip for all US variations. There were statistically significant differences between the 0.9 mm and 0.7 mm tips with micropulsed US (0.8 seconds ± 0.29 [SD] versus 1.4 ± 0.93 seconds; P=.0112) and transversal US (0.8 ± 0.17 seconds versus 1.4 ± 0.89 seconds; P=.0065). There was no significant difference between 0.9 mm and 0.7 mm tips with torsional US or between the 1.1 mm and 0.9 mm tips with micropulsed or transversal US; however, trends were identical, with 0.9 mm tips performing better than 0.7 mm and 1.1 mm tips.

Conclusion: With all 3 systems, the 0.9 mm tip was most efficient, with the fewest outliers and smallest standard deviation.

Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.09.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

09 mm 07 mm
16
07 mm tips
12
tips
8
09 mm
8
11 mm 09 mm
8
tips torsional
8
tips micropulsed
8
09 mm tips
8
07 mm
5
phaco diameter
4

Similar Publications

Accuracy controls: assessing trueness (bias).

Clin Lab Med

March 2013

Global Scientific Affairs, Abbott Diagnostics, Department 09AA/Building CP1-5, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL 60064-6096, USA.

Testing quality control samples is routine in the clinical laboratory but typically these are precision controls that monitor only the reproducibility (random error) of an assay and not trueness/bias (systematic error). To assess bias, accuracy controls that address both systematic error (trueness) and random error (precision) are needed. A properly prepared trueness control can be used to assess both bias and precision, as accuracy is defined by both random and systematic error.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reference Intervals of Common Clinical Chemistry Analytes for Adults in Hong Kong.

EJIFCC

April 2012

Global Scientific Affairs, Dept 09AA/Bldg CP1-5, Abbott Diagnostics , 100 Abbott Park Road.

Background: Defining reference intervals is a major challenge because of the difficulty in recruiting volunteers to participate and testing samples from a significant number of healthy reference individuals. Historical literature citation intervals are often suboptimal because they're be based on obsolete methods and/or only a small number of poorly defined reference samples.

Methods: Blood donors in Hong Kong gave permission for additional blood to be collected for reference interval testing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!