Objectives: The belief in medical care entitlement has recently resulted in major changes in the medical system in the United States. The objectives of this study were the following: to compare endorsement of three medical entitlement beliefs (I deserve the best medical care no matter what the cost [BMC], I am entitled to all of the medical care I want at no charge [NC], I shouldn't have to wait to see my doctors [W]) in community nonpatients without pain (CNPWP), acute pain patients (APPs), and chronic pain patients (CPPs) and to develop predictor models for these beliefs in APPs and CPPs.
Design: CNPWP, APPs, and CPPs were compared statistically for frequency of endorsement of each belief. All available variables were utilized in logistic regression models to predict each belief in APPs and CPPs. Those affirming/nonaffirming each belief were compared by t-test for affirmation of narcissism, dependency, and antisocial practices on three scales from established inventories.
Results: CPPs were significantly more likely than APPs to endorse BMC. No other comparisons were significant. The logistic regression models identified variables that related to narcissism, anger, doctor dissatisfaction, depression, and anxiety, which entered the models for both APPs and CPPs for some beliefs. Those APPs and CPPs who affirmed the beliefs of NC and W were more likely than their counterparts to affirm antisocial practices, but not narcissism or dependency.
Conclusions: Patient medical entitlement beliefs may be related to some psychiatric/psychological issues.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.12210 | DOI Listing |
Objectives: Barriers have prevented full integration of advanced practice pharmacists (APPs) into collaborative practice in some areas despite evidence describing their value. APPs in North Carolina can be recognized as Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners (CPPs) under a collaborative practice agreement and provide comprehensive medication management under physician supervision. This study describes the perceptions of physicians regarding the barriers and benefits of integrating CPPs into interprofessional teams and compares physician and CPP perceptions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Physician
February 2016
Miller School of Medicine at University of Miami, Departments of Psychiatry, Neurological Surgery, and Anesthesiology; Department of Psychiatry at Miami Veterans Administration Hospital; Health Psychology Associates, Greeley, Colorado; Graduate School of.
Background: Many chronic pain patients (CPPs) cannot be cured of their pain, but can learn to manage it. This has led to research on pain "acceptance" which is defined as a behavior pattern with awareness of pain but not directed at changing pain.
Objective: CPPs who have accepted their pain generally acknowledge that a cure is unlikely.
Pain Med
January 2015
Department of Psychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Miami Veterans Administration Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA.
Objectives: Somatic/psychiatric symptoms are frequently found in chronic pain patients (CPPs). The objectives of this study were to determine 1) which somatic/psychiatric symptoms are more commonly found in acute pain patients (APPs) and CPPs vs community nonpatients without pain (CNPWPs) and 2) if somatic/psychiatric symptom prevalence differs between APPs and CPPs.
Design: The above groups were compared statistically for endorsement of 15 symptoms: fatigue, numbness/tingling, dizziness, difficulty opening/closing mouth, muscle weakness, difficulty staying asleep, depression, muscle tightness, nervousness, irritability, memory, falling, nausea, concentration, and headaches.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!