The use of cartilage in revision stapedectomy.

Otol Neurotol

Lippy Group for Ear, Nose and Throat, Warren, Ohio, U.S.A.

Published: August 2014

Objective: To evaluate the incidence of stapedectomy patients who developed significant chronic ear disease resulting in reconstruction of the tympanic membrane with cartilage and concomitant revision stapedectomy. Audiometric results of this subgroup within revision stapedectomy are analyzed, and the salient features of the reconstruction method are discussed.

Study Design: Retrospective study of revision stapedectomy patients during the years 2003-2012.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Intervention: Cartilage tympanoplasty and revision stapedectomy.

Results: Seventeen patients (18 ears) of 144 revision stapes patients were studied who required cartilage tympanoplasty and revision stapedectomy. One-half underwent revision stapedectomy with a modified Lippy prosthesis (MLP), and one-half required a total ossicular prosthesis (TOP). The mean postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was 11.1 dB with mean pure tone average (PTA) hearing improvement of 15.6 dB.The rate of ABG closure was 55.6% <10 dB and 38.8 % >10 dB and <20 dB.

Conclusion: The number of patients requiring revision stapedectomy due to significant chronic ear disease is small. This paper discusses the management and successful outcome of these more difficult revisions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000241DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

revision stapedectomy
24
stapedectomy patients
8
cartilage tympanoplasty
8
tympanoplasty revision
8
stapedectomy
7
revision
7
cartilage
4
cartilage revision
4
stapedectomy objective
4
objective evaluate
4

Similar Publications

Objective: To determine which ear environment risk factors impact ossiculoplasty hearing outcomes and to generate a statistically-valid grading system for ossiculoplasty outcome reporting.

Study Type: Retrospective case series.

Methods: A multi-institutional database was generated from cases performed between 2011 and 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the difference in overall, hospital, and out-of-hospital cost difference of day-case stapes surgery, compared with inpatient stapes surgery, while maintaining equal hearing outcomes and quality of life (QoL).

Study Design: A single-center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral center.

Methods: A total of 112 adult patients planned for primary or revision stapes surgery for clinically suspected otosclerosis were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Revisions after prior stapes surgery: aspects on indication, intraoperative findings and surgical strategies.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

November 2024

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Objective: Primary stapes surgery is considered a challenging intervention in ear surgery. Despite an risk of deafness in 0.5-1 percent, this procedure has still a good benefit-risk ratio due to the improvement in hearing and quality of life that is usually achieved.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To report the intraoperative observations and hearing outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic revision ossiculoplasty.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients who had undergone revision ossiculoplasty were enrolled in this study. Intraoperative findings were documented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Indications, Surgical Strategies And Hearing Outcomes of Revision Stapes Surgery for Otosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on 2602 Patients.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

January 2025

Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health (DSMC), School of Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Objective: To summarize current knowledge on the indications, surgical strategies, and auditory outcomes of revision stapes surgery (RSS) for otosclerosis.

Data Sources: The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science online databases, including papers published since 2000.

Review Methods: The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!