Adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies: interactive effects during CBT for social anxiety disorder.

J Anxiety Disord

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, United States. Electronic address:

Published: May 2014

There has been a increasing interest in understanding emotion regulation deficits in social anxiety disorder (SAD; e.g., Hofmann, Sawyer, Fang, & Asnaani, 2012). However, much remains to be understood about the patterns of associations among regulation strategies in the repertoire. Doing so is important in light of the growing recognition that people's ability to flexibly implement strategies is associated with better mental health (e.g., Kashdan et al., 2014). Based on previous work (Aldao & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2012), we examined whether putatively adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies interacted with each other in the prediction of social anxiety symptoms in a sample of 71 participants undergoing CBT for SAD. We found that strategies interacted with each other and that this interaction was qualified by a three-way interaction with a contextual factor, namely treatment study phase. Consequently, these findings underscore the importance of modeling contextual factors when seeking to understand emotion regulation deficits in SAD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4089517PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.03.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

emotion regulation
16
regulation strategies
12
social anxiety
12
adaptive maladaptive
8
maladaptive emotion
8
anxiety disorder
8
regulation deficits
8
strategies interacted
8
regulation
5
strategies
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!