Social media has created new pathways for postpublication peer review, which regularly leads to corrections. Such online discussions are often resisted by authors and editors, however, and efforts to formalize postpublication peer review have not yet resonated with scientific communities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.032 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings.
Account Res
August 2024
Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA, USA.
The founders of PubPeer envisioned their website as an online form of a "journal club" that would facilitate post-publication peer review. Recently, PubPeer comments have led to a significant number of research misconduct proceedings - a development that could not have been anticipated when the current federal research misconduct regulations were developed two decades ago. Yet the number, frequency, and velocity of PubPeer comments identifying data integrity concerns, and institutional and government practices that treat all such comments as potential research misconduct allegations, have overwhelmed institutions and threaten to divert attention and resources away from other research integrity initiatives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF[International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Statement on Clinical Trial Integrity].
Semergen
October 2024
Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio. CIBERESP. IBs, Granada, España. Electronic address:
Background: Science integrity initiatives require specific recommendations for randomised clinical trials (RCT).
Objective: To prepare a set of statements for RCT integrity through an international multi-stakeholder consensus.
Methods: The consensus was developed via multi-country multidisciplinary stakeholder group composition and engagement; evidence synthesis of 55 systematic reviews concerning RCT integrity; anonymised two-round modified Delphi survey with consensus threshold based on the average percent of majority opinions; and, a final consensus development meeting.
Studying Adherence to Reporting Standards in Kinesiology: A Post-publication Peer Review Brief Report.
Int J Exerc Sci
January 2024
Department of Kinesiology and Public Health, California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.
To demonstrate how post-publication peer reviews-using journal article reporting standards-could improve the design and write-up of kinesiology research, the authors performed a post-publication peer review on one systematic literature review published in 2020. Two raters (1 & 2 authors) critically appraised the case article between April and May 2021. The latest Journal Article Reporting Standards by the American Psychological Association relevant to the review were used: i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPost-publication research integrity concerns in randomized clinical trials: A scoping review of the literature.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
September 2024
IbnSina (Sohag), Banon (Assiut), Qena (Qena), Amshag (Sohag) IVF Facilities, Sohag, Assiut, Qena, Egypt.
Article Synopsis
- The study investigates how integrity concerns are handled after the publication of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) through a scoping systematic review of existing literature.
- Researchers initially searched databases like PubMed and Scopus, eventually extending their search to include Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, resulting in 89 relevant studies from an initial 3,159 citations.
- The majority of included studies dealt with general issues and journal policies, with specific focus on areas like editorial processes and post-investigation actions, highlighting gaps and opportunities for future research recommendations.
[The different models of scientific journals].
Med Trop Sante Int
December 2023
SFMTSI Société francophone de médecine tropicale et santé internationale (ancienne SPE), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Pavillon Laveran, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France.
Introduction: Scientific journals are the main source of scientific data, ensuring their registration, validation, distribution and archiving. With over 2.6 million scientific articles published each year, the turnover of scientific journals exceeds $25 billion annually.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!