The role of imaging specialists as authors of systematic reviews on diagnostic and interventional imaging and its impact on scientific quality: report from the EuroAIM Evidence-based Radiology Working Group.

Radiology

From the Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Piazza E. Malan, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy (F.S., L.M.S.); Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy (F.S., L.M.S., G.D.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan (H.B.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria (D.B., T.H.); Scuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (G.C., C.M.); Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (A.E.); Unità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, Milan, Italy (N.F.); Departments of Radiology (M.H., S.S.) and Epidemiology (M.H., S.S.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Policy and Medicine, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Mass (M.H.); Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland (D.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark (L.J.P.); Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden (K.R.); Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland (Z.S.); Department of Surgery, Vascular Laboratory, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (S.S.); Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.S.); Clinical Research Imaging Centre, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland (E.J.R.v.B.); and Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiolog

Published: August 2014

Purpose: To evaluate the inclusion of radiologists or nuclear medicine physicians (imaging specialists) as authors of systematic reviews (SRs) on imaging and imaging-guided diagnostic procedures and to determine the impact of imaging specialists' presence as authors on the overall quality of the reviews.

Materials And Methods: A MEDLINE and EMBASE search was performed for SRs of diagnostic and interventional image-guided procedures that were published from January 2001 to December 2010. SRs about procedures primarily performed by nonimaging specialists were excluded. The inclusion of imaging specialists among the SR authors and the frequency of publication in imaging journals were evaluated. The quality of a subset of 200 SRs (100 most recent SRs with imaging specialists as authors and 100 most recent SRs without imaging specialists as authors) was rated by using a 12-item modified assessment of multiple SRs (AMSTAR) evaluation tool. Spearman, χ(2), and Mann-Whitney statistics were used.

Results: From among 3258 retrieved citations, 867 SRs were included in the study. Neuroimaging had the largest number of SRs (28% [241 of 867]), 41% (354 of 867) of SRs concerned diagnostic performance, and 26% (228 of 867) of SRs were published in imaging journals. Imaging specialists were authors (in any position) in 330 (38%) of 867 SRs; they were first authors of 176 SRs and last authors of 161 SRs. SRs with imaging specialists as authors were more often published in imaging journals than in nonimaging journals (54% [179 of 330] vs 9% [49 of 537]; P < .001). The median number of modified AMSTAR quality indicators was nine in SRs with imaging specialists as authors, while that in SRs without imaging specialists as authors was seven (P = .003).

Conclusion: Only 38% (330 of 867) of SRs on radiology or nuclear medicine-related imaging published from January 2001 to December 2010 included imaging specialists as authors. However, the inclusion of imaging specialists as authors was associated with a significant increase in the scientific quality (as judged by using a modified AMSTAR scale) of the SR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14131730DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

imaging specialists
44
specialists authors
44
srs imaging
24
867 srs
20
srs
18
imaging
17
authors
14
specialists
12
imaging journals
12
authors systematic
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To determine the feasibility, yield, and safety of fluoroscopic-guided aspiration of the acutely dislocated total hip arthroplasty (AD-THA).

Materials And Methods: IRB-approved, retrospective review of fluoroscopic-guided aspirations of AD-THA (January 2005-December 2023) was performed. Data from electronic charts and fluoroscopy images/reports were obtained.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The cortex and cerebellum are densely connected through reciprocal input/output projections that form segregated circuits. These circuits are shown to differentially connect anterior lobules of the cerebellum to sensorimotor regions, and lobules Crus I and II to prefrontal regions. This differential connectivity pattern leads to the hypothesis that individual differences in structure should be related, especially for connected regions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) may be performed immediately following microwave liver ablation for assessment of ablative margins. However, practices and protocols vary among institutions. Here, we compare a standardized bolus-tracked biphasic CECT protocol and compare this with a single venous phase fixed delay protocol for ablation zone (AZ) assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We developed an AI system capable of automatically classifying anterior eye images as either normal or indicative of corneal diseases. This study aims to investigate the influence of AI's misleading guidance on ophthalmologists' responses. This cross-sectional study included 30 cases each of infectious and immunological keratitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sexuality is a fundamental aspect of health and wellbeing. The management of prostate cancer can result in erectile dysfunction and body feminisation, resulting in loss of masculinity and alterations of body image. Prostate cancer patients identify sexuality as an unmet need and report little or no communication with their healthcare providers on the topic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!