Study Design: Retrospective cohort.
Objective: The objective of this study was to define the intraoperative radiation exposure during freehand surgical technique with fluoroscopic assistance for placement and confirmation of posterior instrumentation in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and compare data with published values using intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for similar cases.
Summary Of Background Data: The treatment of idiopathic-like scoliosis used freehand placement of posterior instrumentation with fluoroscopic confirmation. Computer-assisted navigation systems coupled with intraoperative CBCT have been introduced to aid in accurate placement of instrumentation. Multiple studies report the improved accuracy of instrumentation using CBCT; however, there is a paucity of information regarding the radiation exposure when using CBCT in comparison with fluoroscopically assisted freehand technique.
Methods: Forty-three idiopathic-like scoliosis operations performed by 4 spine surgeons at an academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. Radiation exposure was recorded intraoperatively for each case. Effective dose was determined using published effective dose to dose-length product conversion factors. Values were compared with previous studies reporting radiation exposure for similar cases using CBCT for intraoperative navigation and confirmation of instrumentation placement.
Results: Calculated average effective dose using fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw placement was 0.189 mSv (range, 0.00029-0.953 mSv; SD = 0.16711) per case. Average radiation exposure time was 26 seconds (SD = 18 s) per case, with an average of 11 vertebral levels fused. The literature reports effective dose for CBCT ranging from 7.29 to 9.72 mSv per case for intraoperative navigation and 14.58 to 19.44 mSv per case for both intraoperative navigation and confirmation of screw placement with CBCT.
Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the use of standard fluoroscopy results in markedly lower radiation exposure during a standard posterior instrumented fusion for idiopathic-like scoliosis than by the use of CBCT; this conclusion is limited by the retrospective nature of the study and lack of a control group.
Level Of Evidence: 4.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000363 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of potential ototoxicity associated with sacubitril/valsartan based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Sci Rep
December 2024
Department of Comprehensive Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Sacubitril/valsartan, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, is widely used to treat heart failure. Despite its efficacy, sacubitril/valsartan inevitably causes adverse events such as hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema. Sacubitril/valsartan-associated ototoxicity is often underreported in clinical studies and real-world settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFlexible ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of lower pole renal hard stones ≤ 2 cm: a prospective randomized study.
BMC Urol
December 2024
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
Background: Managing lower pole renal stones presents clinical challenges influenced by various factors such as stone size, location, and density. This study aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and stone-free rates of Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) for treating lower pole renal hard stones (< 2 cm).
Methods: A prospective single-centre comparative study was conducted on 414 adult patients with primary lower pole renal hard stones.
Proton therapy versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of cavernous sinus benign meningioma, a randomized controlled phase III study protocol (COG-PROTON-01).
BMC Cancer
December 2024
ISTCT UMR 6030-CNRS, Université de Caen-Normandie, Caen, 14000, France.
Background: Proton therapy (PRT) is an innovative radiotherapeutic modality for the treatment of cancer with unique ballistic properties. The depth-dose distribution of a proton beam reduces exposure of healthy tissues to radiations, compared with photon-therapy (XRT). To date, only few indications for proton-therapy, like pediatric cancers, chordomas, or intra-ocular neoplasms, are reimbursed by Health systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReduced irradiation exposure areas enhanced anti-tumor effect by inducing DNA damage and preserving lymphocytes.
Mol Med
December 2024
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Background: Partial stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) targeting hypoxic regions of large tumors (SBRT-PATHY) has been shown to enhance the efficacy of tumor radiotherapy by harnessing the radiation-induced immune response. This approach suggests that reducing the irradiation target volume not only achieves effective anti-tumor effects but also minimizes damage to surrounding normal tissues. In this study, we evaluated the antitumor efficacy of reduced-tumour-area radiotherapy (RTRT) , and explored the relationship between tumor control and immune preservation and the molecular mechanisms underlying of them.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnalysis of genetic instability induced by radon exposure in iron mine processing workers in Shandong Province, Northern China.
Front Public Health
December 2024
School of Preventive Medicine, Shandong First Medical University (Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan, Shandong, China.
Background: Radon, a colorless and odorless radioactive gas, poses serious health risks. It is the second leading cause of lung cancer and notably increases lung cancer risk in smokers. Although previous epidemiological studies have mainly examined lung cancer rates in miners, the effects of radon on genomic stability and its molecular mechanisms are not well understood.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!