The purpose was to assess if phonemic categorization in sentential context is best explained by autonomous feedforward processing or by top-down feedback processing that affects phonemic representation. 11 listeners with normal hearing, ages 20-50 years, were asked to label consonants in /pi/-/ti/ consonant-vowel (CV) stimuli in 9-step continua. One continuum was derived from natural tokens and the other was synthetically generated. The CV stimuli were presented in isolation and in three sentential contexts: a neutral context, a context favoring /p/, and a context favoring /t/. For both natural and synthetic stimuli, the isolated and neutral context sentences yielded significantly more /t/ responses than sentence contexts primed for either /p/ or /t/. No other conditions were significantly different. Results did not show easily explainable semantic context effects. Instead, data clustering was more readily explained by top-down feedback processing affecting phonemic representation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/24.22.PMS.118k14w6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phonemic categorization
8
natural synthetic
8
top-down feedback
8
feedback processing
8
processing phonemic
8
phonemic representation
8
neutral context
8
context favoring
8
context
7
effects sentence
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!