Controversies in the anesthetic management of intraoperative rupture of intracranial aneurysm.

Anesthesiol Res Pract

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, 2nd Floor, Herry Medovy House, 671-William's Avenue, Health Sciences Center, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3E 0Z2.

Published: June 2014

Despite great advancements in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), outcomes following SAH rupture have remained relatively unchanged. In addition, little data exists to guide the anesthetic management of intraoperative aneurysm rupture (IAR), though intraoperative management may have a significant effect on overall neurological outcomes. This review highlights the various controversies related to different anesthetic management related to aneurysm rupture. The first controversy relates to management of preexisting factors that affect risk of IAR. The second controversy relates to diagnostic techniques, particularly neurophysiological monitoring. The third controversy pertains to hemodynamic goals. The neuroprotective effects of various factors, including hypothermia, various anesthetic/pharmacologic agents, and burst suppression, remain poorly understood and have yet to be further elucidated. Different management strategies for IAR during aneurysmal clipping versus coiling also need further attention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958760PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/595837DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anesthetic management
12
controversies anesthetic
8
management intraoperative
8
aneurysm rupture
8
controversy relates
8
management
7
rupture
4
intraoperative rupture
4
rupture intracranial
4
intracranial aneurysm
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!