Optical coherence tomographic evaluation of transplant coronary artery vasculopathy with correlation to cellular rejection.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

From the NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (L.D., A.M., T.M.N., A.T.P., S.S., L.E.R., M.A.A., K.D., J.W.M., U.P.J., D.M.M., G.W.); the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (L.D., A.M., S.S., J.W.M., K.X., G.S.M., G.W.); The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China (L.D.); and Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (G.W.).

Published: April 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a rapid vascular disease affecting transplanted hearts, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) helps detect it better than traditional imaging.
  • In a study with 48 heart transplant recipients, those with high-grade cellular rejection showed thicker artery walls and more immune cell infiltration compared to those with none/mild rejection.
  • The findings highlight the importance of OCT in identifying early signs of heart transplant complications, potentially improving patient monitoring and outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is an accelerated fibroproliferative process that affects the coronary arteries of transplanted hearts. Intracoronary imaging with optical coherence tomography enables detection of subangiographic cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Methods And Results: At the time of routine surveillance coronary angiography, 48 consecutive heart transplant recipients underwent optical coherence tomographic imaging of 1 coronary artery. Imaging findings were compared per rejection history that was graded according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation classification as none/mild (International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation 0, 1A/1B, or 2) or high-grade rejection (≥3A). Compared with the none/mild rejection group (37 patients) using Mann-Whitney U test, patients in the high-grade rejection group (11 patients) had a thicker intima in all coronary segments (distal: 0.22 mm [0.09-0.41] versus 0.09 mm [0.06-0.17], P=0.02; middle: 0.35 mm [0.00-0.45] versus 0.14 mm [0.08-0.24], P=0.002; and proximal: 0.34 mm [0.21-0.44] versus 0.15 mm [0.11-0.21], P=0.005) and a higher prevalence of foamy macrophages (distal: 55% versus 9%, P=0.003; middle: 55% versus 22%, P=0.004; and proximal: 44% versus 13%, P=0.05) using χ(2) statistics. Side branches in the high-grade rejection group had smaller lumen diameters and a higher prevalence of intimal thickening (54% versus 36%; P=0.01). Intimal microvessels were also more prevalent in the high-grade rejection group versus the none/mild rejection group (46% versus 11%; P=0.02).

Conclusions: Coronary optical coherence tomographic evaluation revealed that patients with a history of high-grade cellular rejection, compared with those with none/mild rejection, had more coronary artery intimal thickening with macrophage infiltration, involving all coronary segments and side branches.

Clinical Trial Registration Url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01403142.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000949DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rejection group
20
optical coherence
16
high-grade rejection
16
coherence tomographic
12
coronary artery
12
none/mild rejection
12
rejection
10
versus
9
tomographic evaluation
8
coronary
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!