Diagnostic capacity of the keratoconus match index and keratoconus match probability in subclinical keratoconus.

J Cataract Refract Surg

From the Department of Ophthalmology (Labiris, Gatzioufas, Seitz), University Medical Center of Saarland UKS, Homburg/Saar, Germany; the Eye Institute of Thrace (Labiris, Giarmoukakis, Sideroudi, Kozobolis), Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Published: June 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the diagnostic ability of the Ocular Response Analyzer's keratoconus match index (KMI) and match probability (KMP) in identifying keratoconus in suspect eyes compared to normal eyes.
  • Conducted at the University Clinics Saarland, researchers compared KMI and KMP values among two groups: keratoconus-suspect eyes and a control group, utilizing various measures such as corneal thickness and ROC curves for predictive accuracy.
  • Results indicated the KMI was significantly lower in keratoconus-suspect eyes versus controls (0.41 vs. 0.94), with a predictive accuracy of 94%, suggesting that KMI is useful for early diagnosis of kerat

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the Ocular Response Analyzer's keratoconus match index (KMI) and keratoconus match probability (KMP) classification in keratoconus-suspect eyes.

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University Clinics Saarland, Homburg, Germany.

Design: Comparative case series.

Methods: The KMI and KMP parameters in keratoconus-suspect eyes and normal eyes (control group) were compared. The quantitative keratoconus percentage index was calculated for all suspect eyes. According to the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), keratoconus-suspect eyes were divided into 2 subgroups: subgroup 1 (TCT <520 μm) and subgroup 2 (TCT >520 μm). The KMI's overall predictive accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The relationship between KMI and a series of Scheimpflug-derived keratoconus-related indices was evaluated using Spearman analysis.

Results: The mean KMI was 0.41 ± 0.29 (SD) in the keratoconus-suspect group (50 eyes) and 0.94 ± 0.29 in the control group (50 eyes) (P<.001). Nonsignificant KMI differences were detected between the keratoconus-suspect subgroups (subgroup 1, 27 eyes; subgroup 2, 23 eyes) (P=.059). Nonsignificant correlations were found between Scheimpflug indices and the KMI. The KMP identified 27.65% of control eyes as keratoconus suspect and 10.71%, 28.57%, and 3.57% of keratoconus-suspect eyes as being normal, having mild keratoconus, or having moderate keratoconus, respectively. The ROC analysis for the KMI indicated a predictive accuracy of 94% (cutoff point 0.72).

Conclusions: The KMI seems to be a valuable index in the early diagnosis of keratoconus-suspect eyes. The KMP identified a significant percentage of topographically defined keratoconus-suspect eyes as normal or keratoconic.

Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.064DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

keratoconus match
16
diagnostic capacity
8
match probability
8
keratoconus-suspect eyes
8
control group
8
group eyes
8
keratoconus
6
eyes
6
capacity keratoconus
4
match
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!