Objective: To establish diagnostic validity and usefulness of EAT-26 for the risk assessment of Eating Disorder (ED) in a female population.

Description: Observational validation study questionnaire.

Setting: Performed in a Medellin city community care level of mixed (public and private) psychiatric consultation.

Subjects: Twenty five subjects aged 15 to 25 with DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for anorexia and bulimia nervosa and 111 controls without ED.

Main Outcomes Measures: The case sample was for convenience and in controls an aleatory simple one. Gold standard (structured psychiatrist interview confirming the fulfillment of ED case inclusion criteria) was compared with EAT-26 questionnaire; reliability was assessed, cultural, semantics and factorial validation was made and the best cut-off score was established with the ROC curve.

Results: Four domains remain in the instrument: bulimia, dieting, food preoccupation and oral control. The Cronbach's alpha was 92.1% and a score of 11 and over is the best cut-off (sensitivity 100%, and specificity 85.6%).

Conclusions: This modified and abbreviated EAT-26 questionnaire is an ideal multidimensional instrument for ED screening in risk population, with excellent reliability and sensitivity values and satisfactory specificity. EAT-26 is a useful measure to be considered when strategies for ED early detection are implemented in young women.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6983619PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2013.11.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

assessment eating
8
eat-26 questionnaire
8
best cut-off
8
[diagnostic validity
4
validity eating
4
eating attitudes
4
attitudes test-26
4
test-26 assessment
4
eating disorders
4
disorders risk
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!