Background: The optimal management of patients with concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease remains controversial currently. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hybrid or staged revascularization by carotid artery stenting (CAS) and off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) in the treatment of these patients.
Methods: From September 2006 to January 2011, 59 consecutive patients with carotid and coronary artery disease underwent either hybrid (n = 20) or staged (n = 39) CAS and OPCAB, the perioperative and long-term outcomes were analysed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) or death within 30 days of the procedures.
Results: No death occurred post-operatively. Two patients (2/20) in hybrid group and two patients (2/39) in staged group suffered from non-fatal stroke. The combined incidence of stroke, MI or death at 30 days was 10.0% in hybrid group and 5.1% in staged group (P = 0.875). The median follow-up time was 44 months (range, 28 to 80 months) with 57 patients (96.6%) available. During follow-up period, one patient had non-fatal stroke in hybrid group and one patient suffered from MI in staged group, respectively. There was no significant difference of long-term event-free survival between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.390).
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that for patients with carotid and coronary artery disease, both hybrid and staged revascularization by CAS and OPCAB are feasible and safe therapeutic strategies with good early and long-term outcomes. However, our results have to be substantiated by larger scale studies and randomized trials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.12586 | DOI Listing |
R I Med J (2013)
February 2025
Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital.
Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography (PET) can be used for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Compared to other cardiac imaging techniques, notably Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography (SPECT), cardiac PET offers superior image resolution, higher accuracy, quantitative measures of myocardial perfusion, lower radiation exposure, and shorter image acquisition time. However, PET tends to be costlier and less widely available than SPECT due to the specialized equipment needed for generating the necessary radiotracers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFR I Med J (2013)
February 2025
Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence RI.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating advancements in diagnostic techniques. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a pivotal non-invasive tool for evaluating coronary artery anatomy and detecting atherosclerotic plaque burden with high spatial resolution. This review explores the evolution of CCTA, highlighting its technological advancements, clinical applications, and challenges.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFR I Med J (2013)
February 2025
Professor of Medicine, Clinician Educator, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University; Associate Chief, Cardiology, Brown University Health Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, Rhode Island.
Chest pain is one of the most common chief complaints seen in both the emergency department (ED) and primary care settings.1,2 It is estimated that 20-40% of the general population will suffer from chest pain at some point throughout their lives.3 Interestingly although obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence has declined, chest pain as a presenting symptom has become increasingly common over the last decade.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFR I Med J (2013)
February 2025
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence RI.
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This review explores the evolving evidence base surrounding ASCVD prevention, particularly regarding nontraditional biomarkers, risk scores, and cardiovascular imaging modalities. Additionally, this review examines cardiovascular risk scores, including the PREVENT and MESA-CHD scores, which incorporate both traditional and nontraditional factors, thereby aspiring to offer a more equitable and precise risk assessment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!