Locating Errors Through Networked Surveillance: A Multimethod Approach to Peer Assessment, Hazard Identification, and Prioritization of Patient Safety Efforts in Cardiac Surgery.

J Patient Saf

From the *Johns Hopkins Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality; †Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, ‡School of Nursing, and §Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, ∥University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor; and ¶Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston.

Published: September 2015

Objectives: The objectives were to develop a scientifically sound and feasible peer-to-peer assessment model that allows health-care organizations to evaluate patient safety in cardiovascular operating rooms and to establish safety priorities for improvement.

Methods: The locating errors through networked surveillance study was conducted to identify hazards in cardiac surgical care. A multidisciplinary team, composed of organizational sociology, organizational psychology, applied social psychology, clinical medicine, human factors engineering, and health services researchers, conducted the study. We used a transdisciplinary approach, which integrated the theories, concepts, and methods from each discipline, to develop comprehensive research methods. Multiple data collection was involved: focused literature review of cardiac surgery-related adverse events, retrospective analysis of cardiovascular events from a national database in the United Kingdom, and prospective peer assessment at 5 sites, involving survey assessments, structured interviews, direct observations, and contextual inquiries. A nominal group methodology, where one single group acts to problem solve and make decisions was used to review the data and develop a list of the top priority hazards.

Results: The top 6 priority hazard themes were as follows: safety culture, teamwork and communication, infection prevention, transitions of care, failure to adhere to practices or policies, and operating room layout and equipment.

Conclusions: We integrated the theories and methods of a diverse group of researchers to identify a broad range of hazards and good clinical practices within the cardiovascular surgical operating room. Our findings were the basis for a plan to prioritize improvements in cardiac surgical care. These study methods allowed for the comprehensive assessment of a high-risk clinical setting that may translate to other clinical settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000059DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

locating errors
8
errors networked
8
networked surveillance
8
peer assessment
8
patient safety
8
cardiac surgical
8
surgical care
8
integrated theories
8
top priority
8
operating room
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!