Purpose: To evaluate the use of pars plana needle aspiration of retrolenticular fluid in the immediate management of an acute intraoperative rock-hard eye syndrome (AIRES).
Setting: Private practice, Sydney, Australia.
Design: Retrospective case series.
Methods: Data over an 18-month period were collected to evaluate efficacy, complications, and visual outcomes in patients who had pars plana needle aspiration for management of AIRES, which is an acute intraoperative shallowing of the anterior chamber and a marked increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) during phacoemulsification cataract surgery but without evidence of a choroidal hemorrhage. Preoperative and postoperative (1 day, 1 week, and 1 month) data were evaluated. Resolution of AIRES and postoperative posterior segment status, IOP, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were the main outcome measures.
Results: Acute intraoperative rock-hard eye syndrome occurred in 6 (1.45%) of 413 surgeries. All 6 patients were women with a mean age of 81 years. Four patients had dense nuclear cataracts. In each case, the anterior chamber depth and IOP normalized immediately after pars plana needle aspiration and the procedure concluded uneventfully. Mild vitreous hemorrhage was observed in 1 patient postoperatively. At 1 month, the IOP was normal in 5 of 6 cases, while the CDVA was 20/12 in 5 of 6 cases.
Conclusion: Although the etiology of AIRES is iatrogenic, immediate resolution was achieved uneventfully with pars plana needle aspiration, which appears to be a safe management technique with satisfactory outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.038 | DOI Listing |
Br J Anaesth
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Institute for Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Background: Telemedicine may help improve care quality and patient outcomes. Telemedicine for intraoperative decision support has not been rigorously studied.
Methods: This was a single-centre randomised clinical trial of unselected adult surgical patients.
Int J Clin Pharm
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678 Furong Road, Hefei Economic and Technological Development District, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Background: The analgesic efficacy of esketamine combined with butorphanol in thoracoscopic surgery remains unclear.
Aim: This study explored the effects of perioperative esketamine combined with butorphanol versus butorphanol alone on acute and chronic postoperative pain in patients who underwent video-assisted lobectomy.
Method: A total of 181 patients were enrolled, with 90 in the esketamine-butorphanol group (Group BK) receiving intraoperative esketamine infusion and postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) (esketamine 1.
Anesthesiology
January 2025
Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain.
Background: Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after major abdominal surgery leads to poor outcomes. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) may aid in managing intraoperative hemodynamic instability. This study assessed if HPI-guided therapy reduces moderate-to-severe AKI incidence in moderate-to-high-risk elective abdominal surgery patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnesth Analg
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Background: Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery for correction of idiopathic scoliosis is associated with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). In this multicenter study, we describe perioperative multimodal analgesic (MMA) management and characterize postoperative pain, disability, and quality of life over 12 months after PSF in adolescents and young adults.
Methods: Subjects (8-25 years) undergoing PSF were recruited at 6 sites in the United States between 2016 and 2023.
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction with significant thromboembolic risk. Though there are models for use of non-heparin anticoagulants, heparin remains the preferred anticoagulant in many operative settings, especially cardiovascular surgery and percutaneous cardiac intervention. The natural history of HIT can be stereotyped into phases using HIT laboratory testing to guide clinical management and determine whether heparin re-exposure can be considered.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!