Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Computed tomographic (CT) imaging was used to determine the displacement of stranded seeds between day 0 and day 30 following prostate seed implants. Post-plan dosimetry was used to assess the dosimetric consequence of strand displacement.
Methods And Materials: Between March 2006 and December 2009, 86 prostate seed implant patients had day 0 and day 30 post-plan CT imaging. Migrated strands were first identified by inspection of day 0 and day 30 scans. The exact distance of displacement was measured using 3-dimensional fusion software. Post-plan dosimetric analysis was performed using CMS software.
Results: Of the 1550 strands placed, 23 strands exhibited substantial movement and these displacements occurred in 21 of the 86 cases. The measured distance of strand movement ranged from 0.31 cm to 3.44 cm, with mean displacement of 2.75 cm. Of the displaced strands, 15 strands moved away from the implant center while 8 strands moved toward the implant center. A comparison of changes in dosimetric parameters between day 0 and day 30 revealed expected increases in D90 related to resolution of prostate edema. When cases of strand displacement were compared with cases without displacement, there were no differences in D90 or V100 at day 0. At day 30, however, statistically significant decreases in D90 (96.8% vs 89.5%; P = .0061) and V100 (85.9% vs 82.2%; P = .046) were noted for cases with strand displacement. When the data were analyzed by looking at the change in dosimetric parameters over time for each individual case (eg, comparing the difference in D90 from day 0 to day 30 per patient) there was a trend toward decrease in D90 with displacement of the strands but this did not achieve statistical significance (P = .09).
Conclusions: Stranded seeds show unexpected spatial instability in the craniocaudal dimension. Strand displacement may occur in approximately 1.5% of stranded sources placed and about 25% of cases. One may expect mean decreases in D90 and V100 of about 7% and 3%, respectively, among cases exhibiting strand migration in the first month following seed implant. Resolution of prostate edema during the same time period accounts for an approximately 30% increase in D90 and V100.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2011.09.005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!