Objective: Clinical guidelines recommend that patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), the most prevalent mBC subtype, receive three lines of endocrine therapy (ET) prior to transitioning to chemotherapy (CT) in the absence of need for rapid response, symptomatic visceral disease, or suspected endocrine resistance. Little is known about real-world ET treatment patterns among HR+/HER2- mBC patients.
Research Design And Methods: Post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC were identified in the MarketScan databases (2002Q3-2012Q2). Patients were classified as receiving either ET or CT as their first therapy post-mBC diagnosis. Those receiving ET were studied further and stratified into three subgroups based on which of the following events occurred first: transition to CT, discontinuation of ET (90 days without evidence of ET), or end of data or insurance eligibility.
Main Outcome Measures: Mean numbers of lines of ET and median durations of each line were summarized for the overall sample and subgroups.
Results: Among a total of 19,120 HR+/HER2- mBC patients, 11,545 (60%) initiated an ET; median follow-up time for these patients was 17 months. Seventy-four percent did not receive a second ET. The average patient received 1.36 lines of ET. Among patients with 2+ lines of ET, the duration of each subsequent line was significantly shorter than the previous line. RESULTS were similar in all subgroups.
Limitations: Clinical characteristics and reasons for treatment choices are unavailable in claims data.
Conclusions: Fewer than two thirds of patients initiated treatment for HR+/HER2- mBC with ET. Among those who did, most received only one line of ET before discontinuation or transition to CT. Patients who received multiple lines of ET experienced shorter durations of therapy with each line. Real-world treatment with ET falls short of the targets recommended by guidelines, representing unmet need for treatment options that improve the effectiveness of endocrine therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2014.908829 | DOI Listing |
Cancers (Basel)
December 2024
Breast and Gyncological Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
The treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has radically changed over the last few years. CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have become the standard of care as a front-line therapeutic approach, conferring a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to traditional endocrine therapy (ET) alone. However, the wide administration of these drugs in clinical practice paved the way for the emergence of new intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance that seem to compromise second-line treatment effectiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFESMO Open
January 2025
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Background: Randomized controlled trials have shown inconsistent overall survival (OS) benefit among the three cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as first-line (1L) treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Several real-world studies compared CDK4/6i effectiveness, with inconsistent findings. This study compared overall survival (OS) of patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), in US clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Cancer
January 2025
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 PanjiayuanNanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Anti-angiogenesis offers an important treatment strategy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) provides antiangiogenic effects without increased toxicities, making it good partner for antiangiogenic therapy. We conducted the present retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus MCT for HER2 negative MBC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Oncol
January 2025
Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Purpose: The effects of metronomic chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy have yet to be elucidated through a randomized phase III clinical trial.
Methods: Randomized clinical trials were conducted at 12 centers in China from August 22, 2017, to September 24, 2021, and the final follow-up date was August 25, 2023. Patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had no previous systemic therapy in the metastatic setting were enrolled.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm
January 2025
The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.
Background: The introduction of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) has transformed the treatment landscape for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To our knowledge, no studies have quantified health care resource utilization (HRU) or economic burden following CDK4/6i initiation in the Medicare population.
Objective: To describe HRU and quantify health care costs among Medicare-enrolled patients with HR+ HER2- MBC treated with CDK4/6is in the first-line setting.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!