Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial.

Circulation

Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (V.Y.R., M.A.M., S.R.D., J.S.K.); Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (R.E.K., J.R.d.G., A.A.M.W.); Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany (J.S.); Cardiology Department, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic (J.P., J.S., L.S., P.N.); Nanostim, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA (P.J., A.O.); Department of Cardiology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine - IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic (J.K.).

Published: April 2014

Background: Conventional cardiac pacemakers are associated with several potential short- and long-term complications related to either the transvenous lead or subcutaneous pulse generator. We tested the safety and clinical performance of a novel, completely self-contained leadless cardiac pacemaker.

Methods And Results: The primary safety end point was freedom from complications at 90 days. Secondary performance end points included implant success rate, implant time, and measures of device performance (pacing/sensing thresholds and rate-responsive performance). The mean age of the patient cohort (n=33) was 77±8 years, and 67% of the patients were male (n=22/33). The most common indication for cardiac pacing was permanent atrial fibrillation with atrioventricular block (n=22, 67%). The implant success rate was 97% (n=32). Five patients (15%) required the use of >1 leadless cardiac pacemaker during the procedure. One patient developed right ventricular perforation and cardiac tamponade during the implant procedure, and eventually died as the result of a stroke. The overall complication-free rate was 94% (31/33). After 3 months of follow-up, the measures of pacing performance (sensing, impedance, and pacing threshold) either improved or were stable within the accepted range.

Conclusions: In a prospective nonrandomized study, a completely self-contained, single-chamber leadless cardiac pacemaker has shown to be safe and feasible. The absence of a transvenous lead and subcutaneous pulse generator could represent a paradigm shift in cardiac pacing.

Clinical Trial Registration Url: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01700244.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006987DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

leadless cardiac
16
cardiac
8
cardiac pacing
8
transvenous lead
8
lead subcutaneous
8
subcutaneous pulse
8
pulse generator
8
completely self-contained
8
implant success
8
success rate
8

Similar Publications

Background: Concurrent Micra leadless pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) implantation and atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation has been shown to be feasible and safe in patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). However, major complications within the 30 days after concurrent Micra implantation and AVN ablation have been reported. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the concurrent procedure at our institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This case details the successful implantation of a leadless pacemaker following the extraction of transvenous leads in a 72-year-old female patient with a complex cardiovascular history. The patient had undergone a series of cardiac interventions, including a recent percutaneous tricuspid valve repair with a metal clip implant due to severe regurgitation. After presenting with an infection at the pacemaker site, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus hominis was identified, necessitating the removal of the entire pacing system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the paced QRS duration on different sites in age-, gender-, and indication-matched patients implanted with Micra leadless pacemakers and conventional transvenous pacemakers (TV-PM).

Method: A total of 82 patients from Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, were enrolled, including two groups of 41 patients matched according to gender, age, and pacemaker indications, who underwent Micra and TV-PM implantations, respectively. The baseline data of the patients, the pacing site described using three- and nine-partition methods, and the paced QRS duration on 12-lead electrocardiogram were then analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To prevent cardiac tamponade caused by catheter tip slippage during the retraction of the protective sleeve in Aveir VR implantation, it is crucial to carefully evaluate not only the bulge of the protective sleeve but also the shape of the system's shaft using fluoroscopic imaging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Leadless Pacing: Current Status and Ongoing Developments.

Micromachines (Basel)

January 2025

Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Although significant strides have been made in cardiac pacing, the field is still evolving. While transvenous permanent pacing is highly effective in the management of bradyarrhythmias, it is not risk free and may result in significant morbidity and, rarely, mortality. Transvenous leads are often the weakest link in a pacing system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!