AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compares cervical volumes and vascularization indices in singleton pregnancies experiencing threatened preterm labor versus those with an asymptomatic short cervix.
  • Among 300 healthy pregnant women scanned, 29 had a short cervix, while 71 were admitted with threatened preterm labor.
  • Significant findings include smaller cervical volumes and lower vascularization indices in threatened preterm labor cases, while the flow index was higher in the short cervix group, highlighting potential differences in cervical health between the two conditions.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To compare cervical volumes and vascularization indices using 3-dimensional power Doppler sonography among singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor and an asymptomatic short cervix.

Methods: Three hundred asymptomatic healthy pregnant women between 24 and 34.6 gestational weeks were prospectively scanned for cervical length. If cervical length was short, defined as below the 10th percentile for gestational age, the cervical volume and vascularization indices (vascularization index [VI], vascularization-flow index [VFI], and flow index [FI]) were measured. Women receiving any treatment for preterm delivery prevention were excluded. During this period, the same sonographic parameters were measured among patients with threatened preterm labor admitted to our institution during the first 24 hours after admission. Multiple pregnancies and fetal or maternal pathologic conditions, were exclusion criteria. Data on body mass index, maternal age, smoking, parity, family history of preterm birth, mother who was born preterm, and previous preterm birth among the pregnant women were recorded. Sonographic and medical history parameters were compared between the two groups.

Results: Twenty-nine asymptomatic healthy women (9.6%) had a short cervix. Additionally, 71 pregnancies with threatened preterm labor were scanned. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in medical history parameters or cervical length. The cervical volume was smaller in threatened preterm cases (12.90 versus 17.168 cm(3); P = .005). The VI and VFI were lower in women with an asymptomatic short cervix (VI, 4.369% versus 15.939%; P < .001; VFI, 1.514 versus 4.878; P < .001). The FI was higher in the short cervix group (33.581 versus 30.311; P = .006).

Conclusions: Three-dimensional transvaginal sonography reveals differences in cervical volume and vascularization indices between pregnancies with an asymptomatic short cervix and cases with threatened preterm labor, although cervical length is similar in both groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.4.673DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

threatened preterm
24
preterm labor
20
short cervix
20
asymptomatic short
16
cervical length
16
pregnant women
12
vascularization indices
12
cervical volume
12
preterm
10
3-dimensional power
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!