AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to compare the accuracy and consistency of eye measurements and IOL power calculations using a new optical biometer (AL-Scan) versus a standard one (IOLMaster 500) at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok.
  • - Measurements included various ocular metrics from 137 eyes in 81 patients, with results showing high repeatability and reproducibility for both devices, except for the white-to-white corneal diameter, which had lower agreement.
  • - Both devices produced similar IOL power calculations, indicating that the new optical biometer is a reliable alternative for ocular biometry in clinical settings.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare the repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained with a new optical biometer (AL-Scan) and a standard optical biometer (IOLMaster 500).

Setting: Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Design: Prospective comparative study.

Methods: Two independent operators measured eyes with cataract using both biometers. The keratometry values, axial length, anterior chamber depth, white-to-white (WTW) corneal diameter, and IOL power calculated using the Holladay 1 formula obtained with each device were recorded. Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility of both devices were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement in ocular biometry and IOL power between the 2 devices was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method.

Results: The study recruited 137 eyes of 81 patients. The repeatability and reproducibility of both devices were high for all ocular biometry measurements (ICC, 0.87-1.00). Except for the WTW corneal diameter (ICC, 0.44), the agreement between the biometers was also high (ICC, 0.98-0.99). The IOL powers calculated by the Holladay 1 formula were similar between the 2 biometers.

Conclusion: The new optical biometer provided excellent repeatability and reproducibility for all ocular biometry. Agreement with the standard optical biometer was good except for the WTW corneal diameter.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.09.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ocular biometry
20
optical biometer
16
repeatability reproducibility
12
iol power
12
wtw corneal
12
corneal diameter
12
biometry intraocular
8
intraocular lens
8
reproducibility ocular
8
standard optical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!