Eye'm talking to you: speakers' gaze direction modulates co-speech gesture processing in the right MTG.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, 6525EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Psychology Department, Center for Language and Brain, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, 13346 Hamilton, NY, USA, and Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen, The Netherlands Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, 6525EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Psychology Department, Center for Language and Brain, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, 13346 Hamilton, NY, USA, and Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Published: February 2015

Recipients process information from speech and co-speech gestures, but it is currently unknown how this processing is influenced by the presence of other important social cues, especially gaze direction, a marker of communicative intent. Such cues may modulate neural activity in regions associated either with the processing of ostensive cues, such as eye gaze, or with the processing of semantic information, provided by speech and gesture. Participants were scanned (fMRI) while taking part in triadic communication involving two recipients and a speaker. The speaker uttered sentences that were and were not accompanied by complementary iconic gestures. Crucially, the speaker alternated her gaze direction, thus creating two recipient roles: addressed (direct gaze) vs unaddressed (averted gaze) recipient. The comprehension of Speech&Gesture relative to SpeechOnly utterances recruited middle occipital, middle temporal and inferior frontal gyri, bilaterally. The calcarine sulcus and posterior cingulate cortex were sensitive to differences between direct and averted gaze. Most importantly, Speech&Gesture utterances, but not SpeechOnly utterances, produced additional activity in the right middle temporal gyrus when participants were addressed. Marking communicative intent with gaze direction modulates the processing of speech-gesture utterances in cerebral areas typically associated with the semantic processing of multi-modal communicative acts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4321622PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu047DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gaze direction
16
gaze
8
direction modulates
8
communicative intent
8
averted gaze
8
speechonly utterances
8
middle temporal
8
processing
6
eye'm talking
4
talking speakers'
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!