AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate a quality improvement project that provided comprehensive educational support to clinicians on acute kidney injury (AKI) in two large hospitals in England.
  • Significant increases in clinicians’ awareness of local AKI guidelines (from 26% to 64%) and improved self-reported practices for diagnosing (from 50% to 68%) and investigating AKI (from 48% to 64%) were observed post-intervention.
  • The project demonstrated sustained improvements in awareness and clinical practices regarding AKI, indicating that quality improvement initiatives can effectively influence clinician behavior, though further research is needed to address potential confounding factors.

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of a quality improvement project that used a multifaceted educational intervention on how to improve clinician's knowledge, confidence and awareness of acute kidney injury (AKI).

Setting: 2 large acute teaching hospitals in England, serving a combined population of over 1.5 million people.

Participants: All secondary care clinicians working in the clinical areas were targeted, with a specific focus on clinicians working in acute admission areas.

Interventions: A multifaceted educational intervention consisting of traditional didactic lectures, case-based teaching in small groups and an interactive web-based learning resource.

Outcome Measures: We assessed clinicians' knowledge of AKI and their self-reported clinical behaviour using an interactive questionnaire before and after the educational intervention. Secondary outcome measures included clinical audit of patient notes before and after the intervention.

Results: 26% of clinicians reported that they were aware of local AKI guidelines in the preintervention questionnaire compared to 64% in the follow-up questionnaire (χ²=60.2, p<0.001). There was an improvement in the number of clinicians reporting satisfactory practice when diagnosing AKI, 50% vs 68% (χ²=12.1, p<0.001) and investigating patients with AKI, 48% vs 64% (χ²=9.5, p=0.002). Clinical audit makers showed a trend towards better clinical practice.

Conclusions: This quality improvement project utilising a multifaceted educational intervention improved awareness of AKI as demonstrated by changes in the clinician's self-reported management of patients with AKI. Elements of the project have been sustained beyond the project period, and demonstrate the power of quality improvement projects to help initiate changes in practice. Our findings are limited by confounding factors and highlight the need to carry out formal randomised studies to determine the impact of educational initiatives in the clinical setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963099PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004388DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

educational intervention
12
acute kidney
8
kidney injury
8
quality improvement
8
improvement project
8
multifaceted educational
8
clinicians working
8
educational
4
educational approach
4
approach improve
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!