Background: The practice of patient autonomy within the prevailing bioethical framework in the West appears increasingly at odds with the prominent influence of the family in medical decision making in the Asian culture. The actual extent of involvement of patient versus the family in the decision making process for cancer management in clinical practice is largely unknown in Asia.

Aims: (1) To describe patient and family involvement in healthcare decision making in actual practice, and to determine whether those practices are consistent with Singapore law; and (2) to act as a pilot for a larger prospective study examining the preferences of cancer patients on the decision making process, and the reasons for excluding patients from that process.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who died in an oncology ward in Singapore General Hospital from February to April 2011. Patient and family involvement in discussions on (1) disclosure of diagnosis, (2) initial treatment decisions and (3) initiation of a 'maximum ward management' order was evaluated by reviewing case notes completed by healthcare professionals.

Results: Data were collected for 55 patients. Involvement of patients and families at first disclosure of diagnosis was noted in 61% and 64% of cases, respectively. In 12% of cases, the family requested withholding of the diagnosis from the patient. 86% of patients were involved in the initial treatment decisions, and their family was involved in 65% of cases. Only 9% of the 32 alert patients were consulted in end of life decisions. Factors associated with lower patient involvement were advanced age and inability to speak English.

Conclusions: While most cancer patients are involved in the healthcare decision making process during the early phase, familial involvement gains prominence as the disease progresses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000323DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

decision making
24
patient family
12
family involvement
12
cancer patients
12
making process
12
patients
9
healthcare decision
8
disclosure diagnosis
8
initial treatment
8
treatment decisions
8

Similar Publications

Reconfiguring Priorities: Breastfeeding Decision-making Among Young Breast Cancer Survivors.

Cancer Nurs

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Department Research, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona; and NURECARE Research Group, Institut d'Investigació i Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Huertas-Zurriaga); Department Research, Institut Català Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol; Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona; GRIN Group, IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research; and NURECARE Research Group, IGTP, Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Cabrera-Jaime); Tecnocampus University and NURECARE Research Group, IGTP, Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Navarri); Oncology Department, Hereditarian Cancer Program, Institut Català Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, B-ARGO (Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology), IGTP (Health Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Dr Teruel-Garcia); and Nursing Research Group in Vulnerability and Health (GRIVIS); and Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Dr Leyva-Moral), Badalona, Spain.

Background: Breast cancer survivors face unique challenges in breastfeeding decisions. Limited research exists on the experiences and decision-making processes of young women with breast cancer regarding breastfeeding.

Objective: To explain the decision-making processes of young women with breast cancer in relation to breastfeeding throughout the cancer trajectory.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Therapeutic decision-making for older patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer highlights the importance of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). This assessment considers the functional status, comorbidities, and relevant conditions of the patient, and allows for an estimation of life expectancy, but it does not facilitate individualized treatment plans. There are also other challenges to consider related to the cardiac toxicity of the treatments and the under-representation of older patients in clinical trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Tumor boards are a cornerstone of modern cancer treatment. Given their advanced capabilities, the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating tumor board decisions for otorhinolaryngology (ORL) head and neck surgery is gaining increasing attention. However, concerns over data protection and the use of confidential patient information in web-based LLMs have restricted their widespread adoption and hindered the exploration of their full potential.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This meta-analysis compares the accuracy of mandible-first and maxilla-first approaches in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery to improve clinical decision-making. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to August 2024. The analysis included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies with a minimum of 10 patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!