Purpose: Adolescents join clinical research after investigators obtain their positive agreement or "assent." Although intended to respect adolescents, little is known about the views of adolescents or their parents regarding assent or research enrollment decisions. This study aimed to better understand perspectives of adolescent research participants and their parents about assent and parental permission.
Methods: Structured interviews were conducted with 13- through 17-year-old teens, enrolled in clinical research at the National Institutes of Health or Seattle Children's Hospital, and separately with one parent.
Results: One hundred and seventy-seven adolescent-parent pairs were interviewed. Teens were well distributed by age and gender, represented a wide variety of research and illnesses ranging in severity from mild to life threatening; 20% were healthy volunteers. Teens and parents were generally satisfied with the assent/permission process. Normally, they made the enrollment decision together and teens wanted parents' input and support. About 25% of teens reported pressure to enroll, not only from parents or relatives but also from doctors/nurses/research teams. Only 2% of teens preferred not to sign a consent form.
Conclusions: Despite some differing views about how decisions should be made, the current assent/permission process is perceived as satisfactorily respectful by most teens in research. Many teens want to sign consent forms, and teens' signatures should generally be sought. Flexible guidance allows research teams and Institutional Review Boards to customize the assent process for teens in particular studies in order to facilitate an appropriate balance between giving teens a voice reflective of their emerging independence and enabling supportive collaboration with parents.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047975 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.02.005 | DOI Listing |
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)
January 2025
Research Department, Fundación Cardioinfantil, Bogotá, Colombia.
Background: Asthma, a chronic inflammatory lung disease, is one of the leading causes of disability, demands on health resources, and poor quality of life. It is necessary to identify asthma-related risk factors to reduce the presence and development of symptoms.
Objective: This study aimed to explore the association of multiple possible factors with asthma symptoms in two subpopulations, children, adolescents, and adults, in six cities in Colombia.
J Consult Clin Psychol
January 2025
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Objective: This study described therapists' delivery of six child mental health evidence-based practices (EBPs) over 33 months during the sustainment phase of a system-driven implementation aimed at improving access to EBPs in community settings.
Method: Seven hundred seventy-seven therapists and 162 program leaders delivering at least one of six EBPs of interest completed surveys, and these data were matched to therapist administrative claims data. Survival analyses examined (a) therapists' discontinuation of delivery of all Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health direct client services (i.
Due to its heavy reliance on convenience samples (CSs), developmental science has a generalizability problem that clouds its broader applicability and frustrates replicability. The surest solution to this problem is to make better use, where feasible, of probability samples, which afford clear generalizability. Because CSs that are homogeneous on one or more sociodemographic factor may afford a clearer generalizability than heterogeneous CSs, the use of homogeneous CSs instead of heterogeneous CSs may also help mitigate this generalizability problem.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDev Psychol
January 2025
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Intergenerational risk within families, stemming from familial history of mental health problems and encompassing exposure to childhood adversity, poses challenges to adolescent adjustment. However, it is important to recognize that negative developmental outcomes associated with intergenerational risk are not inevitable. To better understand resilience in this context, there is a need for studies that systematically compare different models of resilience.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Importance: Family-centered care (FCC) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is critical for parental involvement and infant well-being, yet few studies have evaluated the impact of FCC interventions on practice or examined how implementation fidelity may affect these outcomes.
Objectives: To evaluate the association between the Close Collaboration With Parents intervention and FCC practices and how implementation fidelity may modify these outcomes.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This nonrandomized clinical trial had a before-and-after design.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!