AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated how 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) affects the bond strength of glass-fibre posts to root canals, focusing on different types of cements (dual-cured resin vs resin-modified glass-ionomer) and storage times.
  • Results showed that the dual-cured resin cement (RelyX ARC) had significantly higher bond strength compared to resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RelyX Luting 2), and CHX negatively impacted bond strength after 6 months.
  • The findings suggest that using chlorhexidine does not enhance bond strength and may harm the effectiveness of RelyX ARC over time.

Article Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) on the bond strength (BS) of a glass-fibre post to the root canal, regarding the cements (dual-cured resin or resin-modified glass-ionomer cement), the root thirds and the time of storage.

Method: Eighty bovine roots were selected and endodontically treated, before being randomly assigned to the following groups according to the luting protocol: ARC (RelyX ARC); ARC+CHX; RL (RelyX Luting 2); and RL+CHX. After 24 h of luting, the roots were sliced to obtain 1 mm-thick slices. Half of each group was submitted to either 7-day or 6-month storage in artificial saliva (n=10). The specimens were subjected to push-out tests with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were analysed with four-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P≤0.05). The failure modes were analysed with a digital microscope (50× and 200×).

Results: ARC yielded a significantly higher BS compared to RL (P<0.001). Despite CHX exerted a significant effect; it depends on the interaction with the luting cement and time (P<0.001). Thus, CHX decreased the values of BS to those of ARC after 6 months (P<0.001). On the 7th day of storage, the ARC+CHX presented higher BS to the cervical and middle thirds compared to RL+CHX (P=0.012). Time solely was not a significant factor (P=0.081). Adhesive cement-dentine type and mixed failures were predominant modes for the ARC groups. For the RL groups, the main failures were adhesive cement-post and mixed modes.

Conclusions: Glass-fibre posts luted with RelyX ARC dual-cure resin cement exhibited higher BS than those luted with RelyX Luting 2 resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Furthermore, CHX was not effective to improve the BS and negatively affected the BS of RelyX ARC after 6 months of storage.

Clinical Significance: The use of chlorhexidine solution seems not to improve the bond strength of fibre posts to root canals, disregarding the composition of the luting cement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

influence chlorhexidine
8
chlorhexidine digluconate
8
bond strength
8
strength glass-fibre
8
glass-fibre post
8
digluconate bond
4
post luted
4
luted resin
4
resin glass-ionomer
4
glass-ionomer based
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!