Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Excitation functions of the (61)Ni(p,n)(61)Cu, (62)Ni(p,2n)(61)Cu, (60)Ni(d,n)(61)Cu and (58)Ni(α,p)(61)Cu reactions were analyzed with respect to the production of (61)Cu (T½=3.33 h), a promising radionuclide for PET imaging. The nuclear model codes EMPIRE and TALYS reproduced the experimental data of all reactions well, except those for the (d,n) process. The fitted excitation functions were employed to calculate the integral yield of (61)Cu in all reactions. The amounts of the possible impurities (62)Cu and (60)Cu were assessed. A validation of the evaluated (p,xn) data was attempted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.02.007 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!