AI Article Synopsis

  • Several studies highlight that diagnostic errors in medicine stem from cognitive and training-related issues, impacting patient care.
  • The researchers propose a novel method called case-based fuzzy cognitive maps to improve medical diagnosis and compare its effectiveness with Bayesian belief networks.
  • Using data from 174 patients across Europe, they analyze factors such as signs, symptoms, age, and sex to evaluate the performance of these reasoning methods statistically.

Article Abstract

Several studies have described the prevalence and severity of diagnostic errors. Diagnostic errors can arise from cognitive, training, educational and other issues. Examples of cognitive issues include flawed reasoning, incomplete knowledge, faulty information gathering or interpretation, and inappropriate use of decision-making heuristics. We describe a new approach, case-based fuzzy cognitive maps, for medical diagnosis and evaluate it by comparison with Bayesian belief networks. We created a semantic web framework that supports the two reasoning methods. We used database of 174 anonymous patients from several European hospitals: 80 of the patients were female and 94 male with an average age 45±16 (average±stdev). Thirty of the 80 female patients were pregnant. For each patient, signs/symptoms/observables/age/sex were taken into account by the system. We used a statistical approach to compare the two methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.09.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

case-based fuzzy
8
fuzzy cognitive
8
cognitive maps
8
diagnostic errors
8
diagnosis support
4
support system
4
system based
4
based clinical
4
clinical guidelines
4
guidelines comparison
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!