In this article, we examine perceptions about the definition of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) in northern India utilizing feminist perspectives as a framework. We interviewed 56 women and 52 men affiliated with a health services nongovernmental organization in the Udaipur district of Rajasthan. We transcribed, coded, and analyzed the interviews utilizing grounded theory. We found that perceptions regarding physical IPV were associated with both structural and ideological patriarchal beliefs and microlevel constructs such as alcohol use. We discovered multiple types of physical IPV in the study region, including rationalized violence (socially condoned violence perpetrated by a husband against his wife), unjustified violence (socially prohibited violence perpetrated by a husband against his wife), and majboori violence (violence perpetrated by a wife against her husband). Our results add to the breadth of research available about IPV in India and create a framework for future research and IPV prevention initiatives.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732314524027 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The association between perceived neighborhood social cohesion and intimate partner violence in a refugee camp in Dollo Ado, Ethiopia.
Confl Health
January 2025
Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most common form of gender-based violence affecting women and girls worldwide and is exacerbated in humanitarian settings. There is evidence that neighborhood social processes influence IPV. Perceived neighborhood social cohesion (P-NSC)-a measure of community trust, attachment, safety, and reciprocity-may be protective against women's experience of and men's perpetration of IPV and controlling behaviors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSystematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Risk Factors of Violence During First-Episode Psychosis.
Trauma Violence Abuse
January 2025
Orygen, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Most people with a psychotic illness will never be violent; however, it is widely known that violence is more prevalent in this group compared to the general community, particularly during first-episode psychosis (FEP). Despite this, there is limited research into what contributes to this increased risk during FEP. The present systematic review aimed to identify whether certain risk factors are differentially associated with severity and timing of violence perpetration during FEP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPolitical Orientation and Attitudes Toward Sexual Harassment: The Moderating Role of Gender.
J Interpers Violence
January 2025
University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Sexual harassment (SH) refers to unwelcome behavior that creates a hostile, intimidating, or offensive environment. This behavior can manifest through physical, verbal, or nonverbal actions. The present study analyzes the relationship between political orientation (left-wing, center, and right-wing) and attitudes toward SH with a focus on the moderating role of gender.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA Digital Parenting Intervention With Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Content: Quantitative Pre-Post Pilot Study.
JMIR Form Res
January 2025
UNICEF Jamaica, Kingston, Jamaica.
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and violence against children are global issues with severe consequences. Intersections shared by the 2 forms of violence have led to calls for joint programming efforts to prevent both IPV and violence against children. Parenting programs have been identified as a key entry point for addressing multiple forms of family violence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTechnology-Related Safety Strategies Among College Student Survivors Using Campus-Based Advocacy Services.
Violence Vict
January 2025
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Violence Prevention, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Technology can be leveraged as a tool by perpetrators of interpersonal violence, which requires survivors to consider digital platforms as part of their safety planning processes. To explore how survivors are addressing these safety concerns, we performed secondary, qualitative content analysis of semistructured interviews with college students who used campus-based advocacy services for interpersonal violence. Participants described an array of technology-related safety strategies they implemented to protect themselves across multiple types of digital technologies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!