Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 144
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This paper compares rates of charge transport by tunneling across junctions with the structures Ag(TS) X(CH2 )2n CH3 //Ga2 O3 /EGaIn (n=1-8 and X= SCH2 and O2 C); here Ag(TS) is template-stripped silver, and EGaIn is the eutectic alloy of gallium and indium. Its objective was to compare the tunneling decay coefficient (β, Å(-1) ) and the injection current (J0 , A cm(-2) ) of the junctions comprising SAMs of n-alkanethiolates and n-alkanoates. Replacing Ag(TS) SCH2 -R with Ag(TS) O2 C-R (R=alkyl chains) had no significant influence on J0 (ca. 3×10(3) A cm(-2) ) or β (0.75-0.79 Å(-1) )-an indication that such changes (both structural and electronic) in the Ag(TS) XR interface do not influence the rate of charge transport. A comparison of junctions comprising oligo(phenylene)carboxylates and n-alkanoates showed, as expected, that β for aliphatic (0.79 Å(-1) ) and aromatic (0.60 Å(-1) ) SAMs differed significantly.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201308472 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!