Prescription drug monitoring and dispensing of prescription opioids.

Public Health Rep

Columbia University, Departments of Anesthesiology and Epidemiology, Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention, New York, NY.

Published: April 2014

Objective: In the United States, per-capita opioid dispensing has increased concurrently with analgesic-related mortality and morbidity since the 1990s. To deter diversion and abuse of controlled substances, most states have implemented electronic prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs). We evaluated the impact of state PDMPs on opioid dispensing.

Methods: We acquired data on opioids dispensed in a given quarter of the year for each state and the District of Columbia from 1999 to 2008 from the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System and converted them to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). We used multivariable linear regression modeling with generalized estimating equations to assess the effect of state PDMPs on per-capita dispensing of MMEs.

Results: The annual MMEs dispensed per capita increased progressively until 2007 before stabilizing. Adjusting for temporal trends and demographic characteristics, implementation of state PDMPs was associated with a 3% decrease in MMEs dispensed per capita (p=0.68). The impact of PDMPs on MMEs dispensed per capita varied markedly by state, from a 66% decrease in Colorado to a 61% increase in Connecticut.

Conclusions: Implementation of state PDMPs up to 2008 did not show a significant impact on per-capita opioids dispensed. To control the diversion and abuse of prescription drugs, state PDMPs may need to improve their usability, implement requirements for committee oversight of the PDMP, and increase data sharing with neighboring states.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904893PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003335491412900207DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

state pdmps
20
mmes dispensed
12
dispensed capita
12
prescription drug
8
drug monitoring
8
diversion abuse
8
opioids dispensed
8
implementation state
8
pdmps
7
state
7

Similar Publications

Background: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) track patients' prescription records for high-risk medications and prompt real-time alerts to pharmacists when specific criteria are met. PDMPs are increasingly implemented by healthcare systems to attempt to mitigate harms associated with prescription opioids.

Objective: This study aims to explore and compare PDMP experiences among Australian community pharmacists from states where PDMP use is mandated and non-mandated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To date, there is considerable evidence of the medical applications of cannabis, however concerns regarding the safety of cannabis are also mounting. To improve the safety of cannabis, nine states have added medical cannabis to their state PDMPs, helping providers to take patient cannabis use into consideration when making prescribing decisions. Across a variety of models using Medicaid State Drug Utilization claims data, I find statistically significant reductions in severely and moderately contraindicated medication fills across two outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluating Postoperative Opioid Prescription Fills and Refills for Adolescents Undergoing Surgery.

J Pediatr Surg

October 2024

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90027, United States; Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St #514, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1845 N Soto St, Los Angeles, CA 90032, United States.

Introduction: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are state-run databases that track controlled substances to reduce substance use and diversion. The accuracy of PDMPs for adolescents who receive postoperative opioid prescriptions is unknown.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at a free-standing tertiary children's hospital from 2019 to 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The social market economies of the Western world considered the provision of plasma derivatives produced from publicly owned blood services as a legitimate state commitment and, until the last decades of the 20th century, many of the relevant jurisdictions maintained state-supported fractionation plants to convert publicly collected plasma into products for the public health system. This situation started to change in the 1990s, because of several converging factors, and currently, publicly owned/subsidized, not-for-profit fractionation activity has shrunk to a handful of players. However, the collection of plasma from publicly owned blood services has continued and recent developments have increased the interest of state authorities globally to increase the volume of plasma collected to increase the level of strategic independence in the supply of crucial plasma-derived medicines from commercial market pressures, particularly the global for-profit fractionation sector with its dominance of source plasma from paid donors in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!