Object: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of medical interventions has become increasingly relevant to the discussion of optimization of care. The use of utility scales in CEA permits a quantitative assessment of effectiveness of a given intervention. There are no published utility values for degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or cervical disc replacement (CDR). The purpose of this study was to define health utility values for those health states.

Methods: The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey data from the ProDisc-C investigational device exemption study were obtained for single-level DDD at baseline and 24 months postoperatively after ACDF or CDR procedures. Patients in the original study were randomized to either ACDF or CDR. Utilizing a commercially available Short Form-6 dimensions program, utility scores were calculated for each health state using a set of parametric preference weights obtained from a sample of the general population using the recognized valuation technique of standard gamble.

Results: The baseline health state utility (HSU) value for a patient with single-level DDD was 0.54 in both the ACDF and CDR groups. Postoperative changes in HSU values were seen in both intervention groups at 24 months. Cervical disc replacement had a HSU value of 0.72. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was found to have a postoperative utility state of 0.71. No statistically significant difference was found in the HSU for ACDF and CDR at 24 months of follow-up.

Conclusions: This study represents the first calculated HSU value for a patient with single-level cervical DDD. Additionally, 2 common treatment interventions for this disease state were assessed. Both treatments were found to have significant impact on the HSU values. These values are integral to future CEA of ACDF and CDR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13718DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acdf cdr
20
health state
12
anterior cervical
12
cervical discectomy
12
discectomy fusion
12
cervical disc
12
cervical
9
state utility
8
single-level cervical
8
degenerative disc
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to examine the relationship between patients' preoperative expectations of pain relief and their functional outcomes and satisfaction after anterior cervical surgery, focusing on data collected from surgeries performed between 2016-2021.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 198 ACDF and 52 CDR patients, finding no significant links between expected pain relief and improvement in functional scores or satisfaction after 12 months; however, higher preoperative dissatisfaction was correlated with better postoperative improvement.
  • The results suggest that while patients’ preoperative expectations may not directly influence their outcomes, those who start off less satisfied may experience greater functional improvements following surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Based on the varying number and relative positions of cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures, three-segment hybrid surgery (HS) presents a diverse structural approach. Currently, the potential differential effects of HS with different segment combinations and surgical procedures on overloaded vertebral body (OVB) occurrence remain unexplored. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of HS and ACDF in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD), aiming to provide further insights into OVB.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Cervical alignment and range of motion (ROM) changes after cervical spine surgery are related to cervical biomechanical and functions. Few studies compared these parameters between posterior laminoplasty and anterior 3-level hybrid surgery incorporating anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cervical disc replacement (CDR). This study is aimed to detect the differences of cervical alignment and ROM changes of the two surgeries in a matched-cohort study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the radiological outcome and development of heterotopic ossification (HO) following single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc replacement (CDR) for cervical disc herniation and evaluate their impact on surgical success.

Study Design: Descriptive comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Neurosurgery Department at Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkiye, between January 2020 and June 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Practical Answers to Frequently Asked Questions in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

September 2024

From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY (Subramanian, Kaidi, Shahi, Asada, Hirase, Vaishnav, Maayan, Amen, Araghi, Simon, Mai, Tuma, Eun Kim, Singh, Korsun, Zhang, Allen, Kim, Sheha, Dowdell, Qureshi, and Iyer), and the Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Subramanian, Mai, Eun Kim, Qureshi, and Iyer).

Introduction: Surgical counseling enables shared decision making and optimal outcomes by improving patients' understanding about their pathologies, surgical options, and expected outcomes. Here, we aimed to provide practical answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) from patients undergoing an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk replacement (CDR) for the treatment of degenerative conditions.

Methods: Patients who underwent primary one-level or two-level ACDF or CDR for the treatment of degenerative conditions with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!