Two important preanalytical protocols performed on liquid-based cytological specimens, namely, automated cytology processing and glacial acetic acid (GAA) treatment, may occur prior to the arrival of specimens in a molecular diagnostics laboratory. Ninety-two ThinPrep vials previously positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) via the Cervista HPV HR test were preselected and alternated with 92 previously negative ThinPrep vials. The specimen set was processed in a consecutive fashion by an automated cytology processor without fastidious decontamination precautions. Carryover potential was subsequently assessed by performance of the Aptima HPV assay on aliquots from reprocessed ThinPrep vials. All previously negative ThinPrep vials yielded a negative result following routine automated cytology processing, despite close proximity to known-positive ThinPrep vials. In separate experiments, aliquots from 236 ThinPrep vials were forwarded for tandem analysis with and without GAA treatment. Data from GAA- and mock-treated specimens generated by Aptima HPV were compared to correlate data generated by Cervista. A 99.2% concordance of Aptima HPV results from GAA-treated and mock-treated specimens was noted. This result differed from the concordance result derived from Cervista (91.5%; P<0.0002). Of the initially positive Cervista results, 21.9% reverted to negative following GAA treatment; the correlate value was 2.7% for Aptima HPV (P=0.01). While deleterious effects of GAA treatment on genomic DNA were noted with Cervista (P=0.0015), GAA treatment had no significant effects on Aptima HPV specimen signal/cutoff ratios or amplification of internal control RNA (P≥0.07). The validity of an Aptima HPV result is independent of GAA treatment and routine automated cytology processing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3993670PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03624-13DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thinprep vials
24
aptima hpv
16
automated cytology
12
high-risk human
8
human papillomavirus
8
hpv assay
8
cytology processing
8
gaa treatment
8
negative thinprep
8
mock-treated specimens
8

Similar Publications

Application of CytoPath®Easy Vials in Cervical Cancer Screening: Self-Sampling Approach.

J Cytol

April 2024

School of Health (ESS), Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 400, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 400, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.

Context: kit (DiaPath S.p.A.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Low response rates in immune check-point blockade (ICB)-treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) drive a critical need for robust, clinically validated predictive biomarkers. Our group previously showed that stress keratin 17 (CK17) suppresses macrophage-mediated CXCL9/CXCL10 chemokine signaling involved in attracting activated CD8+ T cells into tumors, correlating with decreased response rate to pembrolizumab-based therapy in a pilot cohort of ICB-treated HNSCC ( = 26). Here, we performed an expanded analysis of the predictive value of CK17 in ICB-treated HNSCC according to the REMARK criteria and investigated the gene expression profiles associated with high CK17 expression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) is a relatively new technique used to detect molecular alterations with unprecedented precision and accuracy. It is particularly useful for detecting point mutations and copy number variation (CNV) in samples with small amounts of target DNA. This proof of principle study was conducted to see if ddPCR technology could be applied to cytology specimens to detect molecular alterations which may influence diagnostic decision making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The persisting burden of cervical cancer in underserved populations and low-resource regions worldwide, worsened by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, requires proactive strategies and expanded screening options to maintain and improve screening coverage and its effects on incidence and mortality from cervical cancer. Self-sampling as a screening strategy has unique advantages from both a public health and individual patient perspective. Some of the barriers to screening can be mitigated by self-sampling, and resources can be better allocated to patients at the highest risk of developing cervical cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!