A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Defining the role of chest radiography in determining candidacy for pectus excavatum repair. | LitMetric

Objective: The Haller index (HI), derived from computed tomography (CT) of the chest, remains the standard for determining pectus excavatum (PE) severity. The ability to accurately determine PE severity from chest radiography (CXR) may provide substantial benefits. This study proposes to establish data-driven criteria for the use of CXR as a diagnostic modality in the preoperative evaluation of patients with PE.

Methods: A database of 77 patients with PE receiving preoperative CXR and CT was created. Haller indices were obtained from CT scans. Two cardiothoracic surgeons, blinded to the CT HI scores, independently calculated CXR HIs. Interrater reliability, correlations, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated.

Results: A significant correlation was found between CXR HI estimates of the two observers, r = 0.84. Computed tomography HIs were used as the standard for identifying patients meeting surgical criteria (CT HI ≥3.2). From this, sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were calculated for the corresponding CXR HIs determined by each observer. Observer CXR HI estimates had a sensitivity of 0.94 and 0.92, specificity of 0.77 and 0.42, and accuracy of 0.88 and 0.75.

Conclusions: We found a strong correlation between HIs calculated with each modality. In addition, CXR HIs demonstrated good interrater reliability. Although the sensitivity of CXR in diagnosing severe PE (CT HI ≥3.2) was high, specificity was less convincing. However, when using a cutoff of CXR HIs of 3.75 or greater, combined specificity was quite high (0.96). We recommend replacing CT with CXR in the preoperative evaluation for PE. Computed tomography should be used as a confirmatory test for CXR HIs between 3.2 and 3.75.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000048DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computed tomography
12
cxr
12
chest radiography
8
pectus excavatum
8
preoperative evaluation
8
interrater reliability
8
cxr estimates
8
cxr 375
8
defining role
4
role chest
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!