Background: To assess the outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous renal artery embolization (PRAE) prior to radical nephrectomy.

Methods: We performed retrospective chart review of patients undergoing PRAE in Auckland Public Hospital from January 2004 to December 2011. PRAE was performed under epidural anaesthesia and within 24 h of nephrectomy. We compared our perioperative outcomes with the published literature.

Results: Forty-two patients were identified in this series. Patients had predominantly more advanced stage disease with 30 (71%) being T3 or higher (TNM staging). Median operation time was 192 min (range 84-428). 45.2% of patients experienced complications from the surgery. There were no complications associated with PRAE.

Conclusions: PRAE prior to nephrectomy is a safe procedure. There is no convincing evidence in the literature that the benefits outweigh the risks. All published studies are non-randomized and subject to selection bias, so the true role of PRAE has not yet been determined and routine use is probably not justified.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.12545DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

renal artery
8
artery embolization
8
prior nephrectomy
8
patients undergoing
8
prae prior
8
patients
5
prae
5
embolization prior
4
nephrectomy locally
4
locally advanced
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!