Cochlear implantation (CI) has been established worldwide as the surgical treatment for individuals with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. This is a safe and standard procedure in the hands of experienced implant surgeons. Complications due to surgery are minimal and are often encountered in cases with congenital anomalies of the temporal bone and inner ear. Complications in CI are related to malfunctioning of the device or the process of wound healing. In most cochlear implant centers, as the surgeon's skill and clinical expertise in managing various cochlear implant cases improves with years of experience, the complication rates in his series ideally come down over time. Over the years, these well experienced clinics become tertiary referral centers for CI, receiving many difficult cases for implantation and hence such centers report data on complications, which become an important reference for many aspiring implant surgeons. Our study, performed in a premier CI centre in Chennai, looks at the various complications which were encountered in a case series of 300 implantees. Retrospective descriptive study with data collected from operative notes, patient questionnaires, auditory habilitation registers and medical records of cochlear implantees operated between, November 2006 to November 2010. A spectrum of major and minor complications, were categorized. Their incidence rates in relation to the demography of the patient profile and various events during surgical procedure were documented and analyzed. Appropriate management protocols were defined. Our management protocols have been highlighted and the relevant literature reviewed. This report of our experience with 300 cochlear implantees, reveals that complication rates at our center are in comparison with reputed centers worldwide. CI is very safe in the long term and provides optimal auditory awareness with speech perception and intelligibility for profoundly deaf individuals giving them an avid opportunity to integrate within the normal society.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918320 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0387-3 | DOI Listing |
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Objectives: This study examined the relationships between electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) with speech perception measured in quiet after cochlear implantation (CI) to identify the ability of EABR to predict postoperative CI outcomes.
Methods: Thirty-four patients with congenital prelingual hearing loss, implanted with the same manufacturer's CI, were recruited. In each participant, the EABR was evoked at apical, middle, and basal electrode locations.
Background: Cochlear implantation is an effective method of auditory rehabilitation. Nevertheless, the results show individual variations depending on several factors.
Aim: To evaluate cochlear implantation results based on the APCEI profile (Acceptance, Perception, Comprehension, Oral Expression and Intelligibility) and audiometric results.
Objective To develop an algorithm, based on the voltage matrix, for detecting regular cochlear implant (CI) electrode position during the implantation procedure, tip fold-over or basal kinking for lateral-wall electrodes. The availability of an algorithm would be valuable in clinical routine, as incorrect positioning of the electrode array can potentially be recognized intraoperatively. Design In this retrospective study intraoperative voltage matrix and postoperative digital volume tomography of 525 CI recipients were analyzed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Radiol Exp
January 2025
Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 Avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54000, Nancy, France.
Background: We evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) computed tomography (CT)-like sequences compared to normal-resolution CT (NR-CT) and super-high-resolution CT (SHR-CT) for planning of cochlear implantation.
Methods: Six cadaveric temporal bone specimens were used. 3-T MRI scans were performed using radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold (STARVIBE), pointwise-encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), and ultrashort time of echo (UTE) sequences.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of ENT/Audiology & School for Mental Health and NeuroScience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Traditionally, the place-pitch 'tonotopically' organized auditory neural pathway was considered to be hard-wired. Cochlear implants restore hearing by arbitrarily mapping frequency-amplitude information. This study shows that recipients, after a long period of sound deprivation, preserve a level of auditory plasticity, enabling them to swiftly and concurrently learn speech understanding with two alternating, distinct frequency maps.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!